Creationist Nonsense

answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/lucy/lucy-the-knuckle-walking-abomination/
Anyone wanna refute this here article?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YfucpGCm5hY
youtube.com/watch?v=zapJeJZvyAg
youtube.com/watch?v=matJ3MkikDc
answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/australopithecus-sediba/the-problem-with-australopithecus-sediba/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Sounds like the guy is butthurt that a retard freshman atheist fedora autistic slammed his beliefs.

The article refutes itself when the author claims that
1. The bible is historically accurate
2. It contains the word of God as He spoke it.
3. That religion and science are compatible for explaining the way things work.

It's the same old story of creationists crying that their contradictory views are valid.

>buttmad fedorafag detected

>he says while not believing in homo sapien sub-species

these people are the same race

k

>Creation science

>pelvis with low iliac crest shown in quadrupedal position
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I liked Lucy in Attack the Block

What part was Lucy in?

Most of it

>Caring about belief in completely arbitrary taxonomic ranks

lol, this desu

species is a made up thing we invented to make ourselves feel better, because humans are inherently autistic and love classifying shit

True that
But classifying stuff is incredibly useful when trying to discover new things.
Science is based on classification and discovering patterns.

>lol science and taxonomy doesn't matter lol

holy fuck you people are retarded

Step it up senpai
youtube.com/watch?v=YfucpGCm5hY


youtube.com/watch?v=zapJeJZvyAg

Hey, this reminds me of something I discovered recently related to evolution...

Debating creationists does nothing to convert them, but rather gives them a platform to talk unscientific shit.

Only argument they can use for it is "muh doctored pelvis."
youtube.com/watch?v=matJ3MkikDc
This video is still being sold to this day.

But taxonomic ranks are generally arbitrary.

Species, depending on the type of species definition used, at least has a hard definition when delineating the evolutionary tree.
Subspecies does not.

As such not caring about belief in subspecies is justified.

answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/australopithecus-sediba/the-problem-with-australopithecus-sediba/

>science and not-science taxonomy
You just said it retard. Go cry me a river. KEK

Species is an arbitrary term, as is sub-species.

Although a species is said to be a group of animals that interbreed and cannot interbreed with other species, there are plenty of species that can interbreed with each other and produce fertile offspring. Further, sub-species has literally no meaningful definition. Taxonomy has no relevance whatsoever to humans anyway.

It prevents them from converting others. If no one refuted them they'd carry it like a badge of honor.

Amerilards allow them to spout bullshit and parasyte ignorant families.

Bump

Anyone?

One Jason Lisle said, "You won't find this [evidence that the universe is