What is wrong with /pol/?

What is wrong with /pol/?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luce_Irigaray
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

You know what? I really don't care.

You

wew lad

Ironically that pic is from an era of /pol/ when it was somewhat tolerable

...

This.

Nothing at its core, the discourse is just very low-level this it is too easy to troll and the controversy attracts all manner of shitters.

the fact that people like you are making threads like this on Veeky Forums

/pol/ is everyone's problem at this point

it will die down after the election.

As someone who browses /pol/ and Veeky Forums, /pol/ is definitely the more cancerous but can have some good stuff in the smaller threads or if you look hard enough

They are nothing but conspiracy theorists and science deniers that want violence.

They refuse to see reality and are not swayed by evidence placed before them. Show them that climate change is real? It's a conspiracy? Show them any truth about human genetics? It's a conspiracy, ad infinitum.

Science is about seeing the data and the world for how it is, not living in a world of paranoid imaginings.

I decided I won't bother anymore talking to /pol/ about music. They dont listen to it because 90% of them are afraid of liking something "black". Music is the true lingua franca of the world, and it helps bring people together like nothing else. This power is terrifying to /pol/.

>science deniers

Yeah like denying racial awareness. Whites are superior and fit for cities other races lack the intelligence required to live under civilization.

people are too stupid

also, not Veeky Forums

sage

Biology is science related.

Nothing much apart from the trolls who transfer from /b/ for le nigger jokes.

However, there's nothing worse than the /pol/ boogeyman and anti-/pol/defense force.

All it takes is one troll to say nigger and the anti-/pol/ defense derail the thread with their bullshit.

The actual board is 50/50 between /int/-shitposting and country banter and genuine reactionary/conservative discourse and sometimes there's even event-oriented threads like the Hillary foundation general.

It's not. We just need longer bans for crossposting /pol/tards.

>anti-/pol/defense force.

The fact that you get so butthurt by some shitposts on the internet while allowing its "leftist" equivalent to ravage colleges. /pol/ is the price we pay for allowing liberal arts faculties to become so cancerous. Sokal tried to warn us.

please tell me that pic is joke and no one takes it seriously.

Sadly it isn't.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luce_Irigaray
>Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont, in their book critiquing postmodern thought (Fashionable Nonsense, 1997), criticize Luce Irigaray on several grounds. They say she regards E=mc2 as a "sexed equation" because of their interpretation of her response to a question on the subject, for instance when she says "Perhaps it is. Let us make the hypothesis that it is insofar as it privileges the speed of light over other speeds that are vitally necessary to us".[11] They also take issue with the assertion that fluid mechanics is unfairly neglected because it deals with "feminine" fluids in contrast to "masculine" rigid mechanics. In a review of Sokal and Bricmont's book, Richard Dawkins[12] wrote that, "You don't have to be a physicist to smell out the daffy absurdity of this kind of argument (...), but it helps to have Sokal and Bricmont on hand to tell us the real reason why turbulent flow is a hard problem (the Navier–Stokes equations are difficult to solve)."

Kill yourself /pol/ faggot.