Which is worse? Orwell's dystopia, Huxley's dystopia or Kafka's dystopia?

>Half Nigerian
You aren't...coloured...are you?

What does it matter?

I'm just an African-European mix. So Cape-coloured but by no means from Cape town.

I was just saying Huxley's dystopia is only good because it's not actually that bad a place to live by any means and felt like it was more about criticising our endeavour to create a good life for ourselves.

The book itself sucked, unlikeable characters and preachy dialogue.

I thought Bernard was funny in a cringe comedy way.

I just couldn't stop imagining him as Elliott Rodgers.

literally kill yourself you fucking nigger and get off my Veeky Forums

Be careful with that edge, you dour lad!

It's okay Pepe. Don't let my melanin frighten you.

Kafka ain't no dystopian; his works are more than just political/social criticism.

Whichever one we're living in now.

Kafka's dystopia is unconscious so unspeakable. You enter there every night in dreams.

Orwell's is kinda innocent and plain, even if it's a dystopia. Anyway fight stills an option so I would say that it's the better of all.

Huxley's, as we can read above from the Jew, can even not be consider a dystopia. I guess this doesn't make it less worse. And of course is the most similar to the way of life of today.

The worst of all? Capitalism

>nigger
>dumb, shallow criticism of a (not particularly complex) work he doesn't even understand
it checks out

Bradbury's dystopia is way closer to today than Huxley's ever was.

Look up the video of that new MIT robot prototype and tell me that shit isn't the mechanical hound. It's the one where it can lift itself from the floor after falling over

I think that taking away freedom of the mind is the ultimate dystopia. Huxley's isn't by far the scariest too me. There is no escape from conditioning. Plus the descriptions of people as products of assembly lines really made me sweat. The only hope is to be born a world leader or a savage.
Orwells is probably the next scariest dystopia. It is possible to have free will at first in this world, but it can be taken away is you ever step out of line. So again, loss of the self. My worst fear.
Then Kafka's, at least you can still remain yourself in the world. Nobody takes that away. The world might drag you along in the dirt for a while, but you can still remain yourself so it's not half as bad as the previous two.
Bradbury's is shitty sure, but it ends with a reburth of society in the bombing of the city and the new society will be built by only the people who read in the old world so really Bradbury is more uplifting that the others which all end on sad or somber notes, his at least has a glimmer of hope.

>dystopia

Orwell's dystopia is the best.. I mean, everyone gets to have fun, they have cigarettes and pornos, it's all great.

Huxley's dystopia is terrible because odds are you're going to be a lower-ranked human and won't even have adequate cognitive faculties

Kafka's dystopia? You're already in it

If l had to pick a dystopian novel to exist within the world of l would probably pick some shitty YA novel like The Hunger Games because in those the society is usually defeated my teenagers or young adults. The novels aren't about the dystopia, they are about the destruction of the dystopia. So I probably could either kick back and watch some fucking kids save the world from tyranny or l could just do it myself because how hard can it be? Orwell and Huxley created tighter dystopias than these shitty YA writers so l loving I. These worlds wouldn't even be that bad.

Not only that, but the mere fact that the entire dystopia was created by a revolutionary movement of a loud minority of idiots who felt the need to create a safespace environment so nothing too intelligent would offend their tiny brains.

Seriously, Bradbury was the only one who was fucking dead-on, he just isn't taken as seriously because he also wrote sci-fi novels and short stories. I personally think Bradbury was excellent from the perspective of a pure, honest story teller.

Back to your containment board faggot.

Kafka's probably. The concept that I might visit a random prison island with torture devices, or wake up an insect(theoretically), or suffer some other horrible misfortune of fate worse than my nightmares can conjure is something I really don't want.

Nope you got it all shuffled around.

Orwell's dystopia is the one you exist in. Every revolution serves to switch your middle class and upper class and technology knows you're jerking it.

Huxley's dystopia will let you be high AF or move to an island where you get to discuss the nature of reality with other autists.

Kaftka's dystopia is the worst because it's just fucking ineffective bureaucracy and bugs and that's the worst.

Good one.

Kafka's because it's the tyranny of the self. All of his protaganists, from Karl Rossman to Josef K. are entirely responsible for their shit lives.

Yeah but I can shitpost while waiting at the DMV for 6 years and I can shitpost while I'm a bug.

Lowry's dystopia.