Why doesn't the Theory of Evolution come under more scientific scrutiny?
Why doesn't the Theory of Evolution come under more scientific scrutiny?
Michael Johnson
Other urls found in this thread:
lmgtfy.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Isaiah Scott
Why do you never get tired of baiting?
Benjamin Brown
It is
Today evolution is completely different from what it is taught in schools or documentaries
John Bell
Care to explain further?
Leo Powell
Convergent evolution is barely discussed (when two species come together to make a single species) because it throws away literally decades of research into evolution. In other words, it is completely against what evolutionists believe in.
It literally is a shot in the foot for evolutionists
Nolan Cook
Is this like what happens when people race mix?
Brayden Sanders
Biologists were acknowledging that Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection could be imperfect since pretty much the beginning. To quote Thomas Henry Huxley in his review of the Origin of Species:
>What if the orbit of Darwinism should be a little too circular? What if species should offer residual phenomena, here and there, not explicable by natural selection? Twenty years hence naturalists may be in a position to say whether this is, or is not, the case; but in either event they will owe the author of "The Origin of Species" an immense debt of gratitude.... And viewed as a whole, we do not believe that, since the publication of Von Baer's "Researches on Development," thirty years ago, any work has appeared calculated to exert so large an influence, not only on the future of Biology, but in extending the domination of Science over regions of thought into which she has, as yet, hardly penetrated.
Well one example is the concept of inclusive fitness, which is the idea that an organism can still enhance the passing on of its genes even if it doesn't reproduce, by for example babysitting it's sibling's children which contain 1/4 of its DNA.
Liam Young
>evolutionists
stopped reading right there
Ryder Thompson
>Convergent evolution is barely discussed (when two species come together to make a single species)
That's not what convergent evolution means user. It's when the same trait evolves multiple times in completly different species. Like how both insects, birds and mammals (bats) evolved wings.
If anything it strengthens evolutions case.
Cooper Rivera
>Well one example is the concept of inclusive fitness, which is the idea that an organism can still enhance the passing on of its genes even if it doesn't reproduce, by for example babysitting it's sibling's children which contain 1/4 of its DNA
Now THIS sounds like the height of conjecture and is an ultimately pseudoscientific hypothesis