Does cell damage even exist?

In the lest three decades the tobacco industry has been telling us that their products can cause damage to people, but for years before that they were telling us that tobacco was completely harmless.

Does anybody know the truth?

Cigarettes give you cancer.

That's the truth.

I believe after a lot o research that tobacco itself is harmless to your health, but may cause addiction.

On the other hand, smoking stuff in general is bad for your lungs. Also, all the other chemicals in cigarettes today are very carcinogenic.

Would eating cigarettes do less damage than smoking them?

probably more, but I'm not sure.

What are the main differences between commercial cigarettes and loose leaf tobacco?

Loose leaf tobacco is just harvested tobacco, but cigarettes have over 400 added chemicals to make them more addictive.

Less, a lot of the problems come from burning the tobacco itself and the various chemicals in the paper

>Does cell damage even exist?
Yes

Fucking christ, just let them die.

What if cells don't even exist, and all modern science has been lies all along.

I've thought about this. Pretty trippy, man.

When I was second grade I used to think about the possibility that my senses weren't returning accurate results and I wasn't where I thought I was, or when I thought I was. Like I could be home pissing and think I was in the bathroom, but really be in the middle of the classroom and not know it.

YEah, maybe the government men are hacking our thoughts, and blocking our sences.

They're feeding us propoganda.

Smoking causes damage DNA, genetic mutations, mutations in known disease-causing genes, toxins, damage to respiratory system, etc. One of the reasons why smokers "age worse" as seen in "non-smoker & smoker twin studies".

tobacanon, this is the worst thread you've made yet

WTF is tobacanon?

The matrix? The matrix.

no

A schizo that haunts the board with his asinine threads about how the harm from smoking is a hoax

Q: what is the most harmful air pollution?
A: small particulate matter (PM2.5)
Q: what is in cigarette smoke?
A: small particulate matter (PM2.5)

>tobacco itself is harmless
>added chemicals to make them more addictive.

I thought nicotine was extremely addictive.

Is that you OP?