What is the exact value of pi?

>decimal
what makes decimal sacred?
why not octal

If it exists in one base it exists in another.d

Can't write the exact decimal representation of 1/3, does that mean we can't write it out in base 9?

>Luke, did I ever tell you that pi isn't equal to 3?

pi is 10 in base pi.

[math] \pi_{10} = 10_{\pi} [/math]
[math] spoopy [/math]

i use acos(-1)

[math]\pi=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{dx}{1+x^2}.[/math], [math]\pi =3+\textstyle {\frac {1}{7+\textstyle {\frac {1}{15+\textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\textstyle {\frac {1}{292+\textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\ddots }}}}}}}}}}}}}}[/math], etc

pi is exactly 3

*room gasps*

pee pee
poo poo

I'd say if it has a repeating expansion then it "exists", but that's the problem with being vague.

its the circumference of a circle with diameter 1.

Area of the unit circle.

log (-1) / sqrt (-1)

The exact value of pi is pi. Pi is also just a number and in the same way the exact value of 2 is 2, the value of pi is pi.

If you want to get more insight on how pi looks like then check cauchy sequences or dedekind cuts and see how equality is defined when numbers are defined this way.

It is quite a good exercise.

Define value
Define exact
Define is
Define what
Define of
Define ?
Then I will answer your question.

Define 'Define value Define exact Define is Define what Define of Define ? Then I will answer your question.' please.

there exists A : c € A, |A| = 36
let a € A: |a| >= 1
B = {f1(a1), f2(a2), ... fn(an)} : a0->an € A, for all k |fk(ak)| = |ak|
"Define" => {{a4, a5, a6, a9, a12, a5}, f"define"}
there exists exactly one t: f"define"(t) = f"Term"("Term")
Therefore, "Term" = {t, f"Term"}
Therefore, f"Define"(t) = f"Term"
"Define value, Define exact, define is, define what, define of define ?" => f"Define"({t"value", t"exact", t"is", t"what", t"of", t"?"}) = f"value exact is what of ?" = f"what is exact value of"
QED.

Autism

>using irrational bases

dont disrespect my phinary

3.141592654 is all the accuracy you'll need boyo

3.2

22/7 gib or take

Using 10 is undestandable,but why the fuck would you use 3 for pi,why not calculate in its native form

ask wild burger

Time to switch everything to base pi then

Can't write it down though

10 in base pi.

All this fail.
There are series that converge to exactly pi.

Is there a sequence of digits in pi that is equivalent to the sequence created by looking at every other digit of pi?

Ask the Daniel Tammet

>3.1428571428571428571428571428571 = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795

whatever the fuck I want it to be nigger

>There are series that converge to exactly pi.
and?

3.1415......1

No finite value as the length of a circle is theoretically infinite

>log (-1) / sqrt (-1)
nah
encrypted.google.com/#q=log (-1) / sqrt (-1)

If the largest object that could possibly exist were a sphere how many decimals of pi would be needed to calculate it down to the exact planck length

What is the accuracy you need so that the error in calculating the circumference of the observable universe is less than the Planck length?

>π10=10π
>spoopy

1+2+3 = 1*2*3

>What is the accuracy you need so that...
>I've never heard of Google (or calculators)

The circumference of the observable universe is 27.6e+26 meters or 1.7e+62 Planck lengths.
So about 62-ish decimal places.
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445

...

as you can see from no calculator has that accuracy

Reminder that there is literally no reason to believe that the Planck length is the minimum distance you can consider

3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286 208998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481 117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381964428810975665933446128475648233 786783165271201909145648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273724587006 606315588174881520920962829254091715364367892590360011330530548820466521384146 951941511609433057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548074462379962749 567351885752724891227938183011949129833673362440656643086021394946395224737190 702179860943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132000568127145263560827 785771342757789609173637178721468440901224953430146549585371050792279689258923 542019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960518707211349999998372978049 951059731732816096318595024459455346908302642522308253344685035261931188171010 003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303598253490428755468731159562863882 353787593751957781857780532171226806613001927876611195909216420198938095257201 065485863278865936153381827968230301952035301852968995773622599413891249721775 283479131515574857242454150695950829533116861727855889075098381754637464939319 255060400927701671139009848824012858361603563707660104710181942955596198946767 837449448255379774726847104047534646208046684259069491293313677028989152104752 162056966024058038150193511253382430035587640247496473263914199272604269922796 782354781636009341721641219924586315030286182974555706749838505494588586926995 690927210797509302955321165344987202755960236480665499119881834797753566369807 426542527862551818417574672890977772793800081647060016145249192173217214772350 141441973568548161361157352552133475741849468438523323907394143334547762416862 518983569485562099219222184272550254256887671790494601653466804988627232791786 085784383827967976681454100953883786360950680064225125205117392984896084128488 626945604241965285022210661186306744278622039194945047123713786960956364371917

>no calculator has that accuracy
I used Google, Yahoo Answers. Wikipedia and calc.exe to come up with the answer.

I used Veeky Forums. Easier.

-1 + 0 + 1 = -1*0*1

It's 1 in base-pi.

think again

How do you write an integer in base pi

1 = 10/10 for example

That's easy, how do you write 2?

10/10 + 10/10 = 20/10

4

>using ellipses when there is no known pattern

fucking kek

The integers in base pi are pi, 2pi, 3pi in base 10.

This guy gets it.

Pi = the first non trivial zero of the serie defined by sin x = x - x^3/6 +x^5/120...

just change topology till pi=1

>The integers in base 10 are 10, 2*10, 3*10, 4*10,...

are you retarded?

K.e.k

Pi is so big...

Where's the rest?

...

wolframalpha.com/input/?i=log (-1) / sqrt (-1)

0.5 * 0.5 does not equal 1

I don't think that's implied anywhere

ok
encrypted.google.com/#q=ln (-1) / sqrt (-1)

> integer base system
> not pi base

The exact value of pi is 1

About three and one tenth

Pig is so bi...

fucking retards relying on web-based calculation
go to hell shitty minds
(or to your garbage collecting company)

0.5 radius you dingus
1 diameter

What is a?

literally I just hand drawed pic related

this picture is actually a really good example of the difference between progressing toward infinity and actual infinity, no matter how many squares you subtract from it the perimeter is still 4, it can't make the jump to 3.14 until you change the axioms

There is no "actual infinity". Infinity is not a number.

Engineer detected

then how many numbers are there?

Your question is invalid.

It's the same as walking along a circle and asking "how long till the end?".

you're an idiot

Sure, as long as you agree that infinity is not a number and that the question "then how many numbers are there?" is invalid.

The question is not invalid. The answer is infinity. Who said the answer had to be a number?

It has nothing to do with infinity. Basically, the more "remove squares" the more you approach a situation where you get a bunch of tiny spikes whose perimeter will approach 2pi-4

"how many" implies a finite number as an answer.
If anything, a better answer would be "infinite amount".

how do you define "invalid"? the fact that you can't fathom infinity doesn't mean it can't exist, the question is not unanswerable but rather you choose not to answer it