How deep have you gotten Veeky Forums?

Vector Spaces

>cohomology listed deeper than algebraic topology

Bruh

This, why is cohomology even separate from algebraic topology? It's a topic in algebraic topology

>hairy ball theorem
>next to knot theory
>harder than topology

But the hairy ball theorem you prove in undergrad topology and you can't even prove the existence of a knot without using homotopy groups

I don't think whoever made this image has a degree in math

algebraic geometry via wildberger, else only calculus. Im aiming for understanding harmonic analysis and stochastics in several years

chaos theory i guess but at a basic level

Pretty deep into serious math, I'm surprised

Game theory is as far as I've ever gone, but the majority of what I deal with is statistics.

Being an Econ undergrad is fun

homological mirror theory is all quantum physics-y. albert einstein shouldve been an economist =^D

same but at grad level

>Boolean algebra in same level as fractals
How come

I've made it to control theory

Cryptography + Real Analysis

Rate me Veeky Forums

Some basic knowledge about topics in the upper part of "serious math"

Finished Calc 3 and I'm taking Diff Eq right now. (A+ in all my math classes of course)

triple integrals

>One-Time Pad Decryption
>Highest on the meme chart
I disagree desu

Just above (or below depending on how you look at it) the genius level gap. Someone should try and make a serious chart instead of this horse shit though.

I dabble in random sequence extrapolation, and frequently dream in poly-dimensional topology.

Cohomology seems to be the deepest thing for me.

Vectors.

I'm a pleb.

Multiplication.
Basic geometry is too hard for me.

36 years old here, manager.55k per year.

Cheers.

Differentiation and trig is harder than complex numbers? lolno

I think they all fall into the category of piss-easy.

But yeah the order of the chart is broken. Boolean algebra next to Banach Spaces.

counting nigga

If it weren't for systems of nonlinear equations, who knows what I could do.

I had to retake Trigonometry twice because they never told me how to solve them, they just assumed I learned it because I came from a different school.

I once prided myself on being really good and proficient at non-linear second order differential equations. Then I realized that they were just tedious, and even though it took me almost an entire page to solve some of them, it wasn't a really an impressive feat. I don't think I'll ever feel proud of myself in much of anything I do.

"Projective Variety" UNDER algebraic geometry??????? Considering you study projective varieties in AG what the fuck

Hilbert spaces that low, christ this list is bad

Some stuff in this list make no sense, like putting eigen values below PDEs.
Anyway, I took Algebraic number theory, algebraic geometry and riemann surfaces last year and I'm taking arithmetical geometry (modular forms and Galois cohomology) this year.
For now, the courses are an algebraic number theory course like the one I took last year, but with a bit more content in the end of the semester and a course on modular forms that really russles my algebrist jimmies.

Comp sci major so I'm floating around the serious math level. The deepest is boolean algebra, but I have no idea what the fuck it's doing way down there.

Do you know Stone's Representation Theorem for Boolean Algebras and the ultrafilter lemma? If not, you don't know Boolean algebra.

I have only made it to serious math I suppose.

If you did then you would know it doesn't belong down there

Where's the version that has triple integrals at the bottom bottom?

I was expecting that minor chuckle but it never came. You suck at this.

I'm currently working on Irrational Pattern functions. So far I found and generated the repeating patterns found inside of less complex irrational numbers. (is also related to poly-dimensional topology)

Its pretty easy, you just need to understand how numbers and patterns work, and know what you're looking for when you approach an "irrational*" number.

*they are quite rational, and repeat in cyclic patterns, just not as single digits :)

Just finished addition, now doing subtraction (A+ in all math classes of course)

Fractals

>four color theorem

>Eigenvalues below tensors and matrices
??? Doing some piss easy determinant and finding the roots of some cubic polynomial is not as difficult as tensors.

Make the bit you have green red, then use green for your "fifth color".

look at the outer circle

>tfw four color theorem has never been proved

Now try and figure out spectral sequences. :'(

double nigger or troll detected

Isnt there a 6th(black) color too?

too deep for my own good

Logarithms.

>theorem of differential topology proved in undergrad topology
>existence of knots needs homotopy groups
I don't think you have a degree in math either.

Those are boolean algebras, not algebraic manipulation of booleans.

basic boolean algebra

what a fucking retarded pic

Not quite so far down but below real analysis.

ive gotten to taylor series but i forgot how to do division.

I know this is low-quality bait,but shouldn't inter-universal teichmuller theory be at the bottom? like 10 people understand it

Counting is my max.
Everyone else is lying.

Honestly, trig and some calculus for me. Forgot almost everything out of school. Am I basically retarded by Veeky Forums standards?

No, this board is science AND math. Unless you study math at University you will never get really far beyond Calculus 1 and 2 and Linear Algebra

I am just before " serious math " but i am a biologist.

It's gonna take a few weeks probably, but I'm on my way there. I like Rotman's books. Did you just answer a random poster talking about cohomology or did you guess/recognize "anime bro"?

I'm trying to understand spectral sequences from the nPOV right now and am struggling, so I wanted to bring them up I guess. There are multiple anime posters on here, I didn't know it was you!

Ignore anime posters.
Sage anime posters.
Delete anime posters.

fuck yeah control theory. feels good mang.

I see. As I said, I'm getting there.

But we have reached some sort of harmony!

post homu pls

Tk yr pdphl crtns t

Ok

Take your complaints back to

Only in America.

High school drop out. I learned to add, subtract, and multiply. Never learned division or anything else. Even I know how shitty that image really is. lol

You clueless moron. At least some ignoramuses know they're ignoramuses.

>convergence deep as Fourier series

Vertex algebras/conformal field theory/geometric stacks/lie algebroids/R matrices/symplectic geometry/poisson schemes . It's pretty clear this meme wasn't authored by an expert, so in my opinion I got to the bottom before whatever computational crap is deemed AI exclusive.

>triple integrals
>below single integrals

I want to study cryptography but I make more money as a x Ray tech so nvm

And yet, scientifically, we're so far ahead that it isn't even funny lol

the serious math branch should be moved down a bit, I've done a number of topics below that and shudder at actual math (because I'm a pussy).

Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors

I'm doing a new kind of math called HME. It's a secret math program that aliens have created to improve mathematical comprehension in us humans.

They can't directly give us technology due to their intergalactic laws and treaties.

They told me that if they gave us their tech without us having the ability to understand it first... We would end up like the niggers in Africa or the middle east, who are currently using the superior white mans AK47s and explosives to kill each other due to their inability to respect the technology.

Therefore, they have many of us learning their math so that it may become part of humanity as we slowly introduce it to the rest of the world.

Everything down to serious math
Combinatorics
Complex Analysis
Boolean Algebra (should be much higher)

>this is what ignorant people in the USA actually believe

I've gotten to cohomology and the extension problem (not listed for some retarded reason.)
I wholeheartedly think this image was made by an idiot.

>Veeky Forums
>standards

Not way higher, just a bit. Should still be below real analysis.

Yes, but only because you're asking that question instead of compulsively binge-studying and puking up your lunch