Is "racial realism" valid or is it pseudoscience?
Is "racial realism" valid or is it pseudoscience?
Jace Williams
Other urls found in this thread:
nature.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
science.sciencemag.org
nature.com
pnas.org
genome.cshlp.org
nature.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
study.com
umforensics.wikispaces.
usaswimming.org
usaswimming.org
library.flawlesslogic.com
rense.com
amren.com
ucr.fbi.gov
ssa.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
nature.com
blogs.discovermagazine.com
en.wikipedia.org
ghr.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pss.sagepub.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
Aiden Lee
fuck off there is no signifigant genetic difference between someone with black skin and someone with white skin
Jordan Allen
further more the golden jackal is one species and just because an animal looks similar to another does not mean you can compare them to blacks and whites and say that they are distinct species. think convergent evolution pic related
Isaac Jenkins
Every dog is a dog, but they come in different races.
Every human is a human, but we come in different races.
Why is acknowledging this simple logic truth being racist? We even evolved differently, the smartest individual survived in the white world, the strongest individual survived in the black world, we happily acknowledge that negroids are by default much more fit than white men, but somehow it's racist to say whites are on average smarter.
Jeremiah Jenkins
Based Darwin settled this issue centuries ago. Everything else is just unscientific bias.
We develop differently based on our environment and needs to survive. When agriculture and trade were discovered, it was much more efficient to have a better brain than a better body, as you'd become wealthy and thus secure your descendance.
Being black is actually a sign that your ancestors lived off in a barren, very hot territory, with little room for shelter. Agriculture and trade can only develop so far under those conditions, so the strongest individual is the most likely to survive the extreme condition. A weak body with a above average intelligence can't fare well in those conditions and thus doesn't progress as far, since what makes evolution skyrocket is the reliance upon intelligence and body strength
Jordan Carter
It depends if their offspring are fertile
Luis Ramirez
>And body strength
Meant and not body strength
Easton Scott
Intelligence makes you build shelters n shiet.
No resources=migrate
Isaiah Watson
If two things can produce viable offspring they are the same species
Angel Baker
What about ligers and other hybrids?