prove me wrong
The truth is ternary
I may not be able to prove you wrong but I can prove you aren't right
how about both?
Base e is more efficient than base 3.
show me a computer that works with base e on the hardware level. it's not implementable in real life.
e is irrational and so are you.
3 most efficient integer and the only base superior to binary.
when will people realize this?
life is ternary
>things are too hot too cold or neither cold nor hot
>things are too big too small or neither small nor big
>people lie or say the truth or neither lie nor say the truth
>people are right or are wrong or neither right nor wrong
deal with it
But all ternary logic can be reduced to binary logic...
Ternary allows for the same computations to be expressed more efficiently though. Base e is the most efficient radix and 3 is closer to e than 2.
>tfw too smart for exclusion of the middle
OP here
wow not one meme as of now
are we finally making progress?
You meant to say the truth-value, not truth. There, I proved you wrong.
>.gif
>not animated
Missed a huge opportunity for a badass gif there.
>truth
>2016
ISHYGDDT
Except all your 'or neithers' are arbitrary and thus wrong, Binary is the only system from which an universe can rise.
>Ternary allows for the same computations to be expressed more efficiently though
At the cost of having a lot more than just 3 (actually 16 but 13 of them are composite) expressions for processing 2 values. With binary you can express EVERY FUNCTION with just 5 symbols, 0, 1, AND, OR, XOR. Try that with ternary.
>>people lie or say the truth or neither lie nor say the truth
>>neither lie nor say the truth
What's an example of this? Just sitting there and saying nothing? How can this be implemented into computer hardware?
>too smart
keep dreaming
He's just wrong as you can remove EVERY third expression form his flawed logic. Also numbers are about absolutes, not about "not either".
>>things are too hot too cold or neither cold nor hot
Too hot or too cold are 2 different things, so you are are actually expressing this in binary: 10: too hot, 01: too cold, 00 neither
>>things are too big too small or neither small nor big
same thing
>>people lie or say the truth or neither lie nor say the truth
same thing, and retarded example
>>people are right or are wrong or neither right nor wrong
same thing, and even more retarded example
Fucking opting for ternary when all your statements are binary. KEK.
It has recently been shown that while binary Chu spaces cannot model quantum mechanics, ternary Chu spaces (where the dualizing object is a 3-element set) can, so you may have something there.
just plain wrong
every function maybe but not every value
>the truth is ternary
I agree, I discovered this fact on an acid trip
yes no maybe
Truth is a social construct.
OP here, I'd also like to add that balanced ternary notation is able to model accurate waveforms without the need to round/quantize, as infinitely repeating decimals (but with finite cycle) display as a finite number in ternary.
also miller indices are able to describe any state of crystallization that exists, by using a ternary notation.
there are many advantages and many uses to ternary but it has to fight against the well established, hardly questioned and by nature polarizing binary.
bump
Having a truth value set as limited as integers is wrong. Truth value is really a spectrum from -infinity to +infinity.
Prove me wrong.
OP is clearly talking about three-valued logic, not the ternary number system. The retards on Veeky Forums once again never cease to amaze.
There is no single truth. There an an infinite number of truths depending on the vantage point of the observer. Everything and nothing is true.
← this
oops, well played
>ternary is le truth
>truth tables are even more of a pain in the ass to fill out in ternary than in binary
lol fuck off