>Why would understanding model theory necessarily make one into a non-finitist?
It wouldn't necessarily, but at least you wouldn't be an edgelord claiming that the Peano axioms are "not true" like most finitists do. If you understand model theory then there is no point in being a partisan towards a particular theory, any more than using ZFC makes you a "setist", or studying graph theory makes you a "graphist" etc.
Have you ever actually discussed this with actual people instead of fantasy strawman? Because I can't see evidence of that from your shitposting. Wildberger isn't making videos for you. He doesn't care about you at all.
I'm not sure what your point is - I don't care about Wildberger either except for the fact that he might be convincing people of shitty ideas.
Why do we even need axioms? Aren't definitions of objects/interactions enough?
>non-Platonic
get