Is there a guide on having a gf?

>Love

I find it quite pathetic that women can't see through "confidence". Do they not realize how silly it is that it works so easily on them?
I'd say the first user had it right anyway, trial and error. Most people don't try too much.

>have never been loved, never will be
>pfff, I am above that anyway

>exploiting girls to get laid
takes two to tango, these girls are far more volatile than me

i'm glad i've dealt with soul-killing sloots because they teach you valuable lessons: how to have rock solid frame and pass shit tests.

then when you meet your one twoo wuv you can maintain it better, because even though pure waifus don't shit test as much as the sloots, they still do it when things get rocky. fail those enough and you could lose the best thing you ever had.

also, it teaches you important tools, like dread game. women react differently to jealousy than men: while it just pisses us off to see our (hypothetical) girl surrounded by men flirting with her, a girl is instead both pissed off and turned on to see other girls flirting with her man. it's fucking obvious once you realize this: often she'd chew you out and then try to get intimate with you.

being attractive enough that you invite this sort of flirting from women is excellent for creating relationship intimacy with your girlfriend over a long period of time. this doesn't mean flirting with other girls, it just means being polite and conversational with any such girl and not bounding to SHUT IT DOOOOOWN and inform everyone you're a kept man. it means being cocky about it and not apologizing for being attractive. just by being in a relationship you're more attractive to other girls (preselection), so you'd receive more flirting.

>taking advice from a guy who calls himself chateau heartiste

What the fuck does he think he is, wine?

Plato's symposium

>Brevity is the glow of clits.

you're ovaryacting my man

yeah that one's from him too

"Tao Lin zajebał mi szlugi"
Meaning tao lin stole my fags, or so goes a famous Polish saying.
I've always taken it as a joke, a tool to fill my repertoire against the self-claimed True Polish Patriots on the Internets, who tend to get butthurt about those kind of things.
However, last semester I found out it was never meant to be a joke.
Me and my friend were getting a takeaway. It was in the UK and on a uni campus, and that per se should make it a relatively safe activity.
However, as we entered the store my friend began to frantically search his pockets. He asked me if I, by any chance, haven't seen his fags. He said he's only smoked one out of the pack so he couldn't possibly have just thrown them away.
That's when it hit me.
Had I not turned around and saw tao and had I not swung a stool at him with all the might my body could physically exert, we might have not had returned home that day.
Tao cried out with a sound so alien and terrifying both of us froze in place. That's when he saw his opening and rushed to the exit. As he stood in the doorway he took out a fag from the stolen pack, looked directly in my friend's eyes and took a puff. Slowly, he turned around and walked outside, vanishing in the thick night mist.
There were no other customers and the staff was in the back room at the time so we were the only ones who witnessed it.
Since then another similar incident had happened, but that's a story for another time...
This cannot go on. The monster has to be stopped.
Send help.

lol how old are they here.

Thanks, it makes some sense.

Are you doing okay, buddy?

great, now I'm rethinking the usefulness of freedom of the press

some of these guys honestly deserve to be hanged

They're asses (mostly because flirting with a woman should be about the second most instinctive thing you can do with your mouth) but they're not total evil. Horny sociopaths are practically the governing party of male culture.

And let's not act like these people aren't successful for it, although really, the easiest fucking thing is to be interested in a girl and be interesting back. It's really just a game of questions.

And if Herod had been successful, should we have applauded him for it? Since success is, in itself, so laudable!

I believe those men do experience success with their methods; and their success is a great evil, an evil which they are encouraging others to emulate.

I'm sorry you don't think they are evil; I agree somewhat—THEY are not evil, but they practice evil, and their theories encourage evil.

nah, the girls that shit works on are running the same plays. if anything, it pairs off shallow people who just want to fuck as their fake personality. it's more consensual self insertion than porn for both sexes because the porn can't say yes and neither can masturbation aides. it's not going to get you deep relationships or heartfelt intimacy, but it's as intimate as those kinds of people want to be with their sex partners.
don't fuck with a good thing that keeps the narcissists communicating among themselves.

aristotle detected

dude just b urself

he directs his writing at men who have "oneitis" and tell them to drop it; he tells men who are inclined to monogamy that in order to succeed they must be polygamous. he is telling men to wreck their own immortal souls, at the very least.

but sex is only for women and men who desire to please women

>Having sex

stoner

kek

>women are hedonistic, which means they are egotistic and what feeds their ego is their pleasures.
>men want to be validated
ego seems pretty involved on both ends. stop trying to draw distinctions between the genders that don't exist.

>majority of city girls are sluts, and they know that we know this

>You never listen to me.
>“What?” This reply never fails to elicit a grudging smile. But don’t overuse it. After the third time, say “Look, don’t make impossible demands on me that no normal person could fulfill. You want to be with a man, or with a voice recorder?”

>“How may girls have you been with?”
>Any reply but a straight one will do

>“Come hang out with me and my friends.”
>She’s testing your skillfulness at evading the friendzone. Worst thing you can do is agree.

>“I hate you!” is girlcode for “I hate you for making my gina buzz like a hornets’ nest!”

Cheers, reading this with my wife and laughing our asses off.

However, it really worries me that some people might actually take the advice. This is the sort of stuff that destroys the social lives of young men. There should be a disclaimer of some kind, you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet.

>a girl is instead both pissed off and turned on to see other girls flirting with her man
I have a hard time believing this. If anything, she's throwing sex at you to make sure you don't stray off and to distract herself from the stress.

>she'd chew you out and then try to get intimate with you.
Yes, to assert her dominance and ownership over you.

Self hatred: the movie: the post

all of those are great, the "hang out with me and my friends" one can go either way though. depends on the girl.

give us your majestic replies in each situation

couples who have sex frequently rate their relationship happiness as higher in all social surveys

is it your natural inclination to want to fuck your SO when seeing the role-reversed version, or are you more likely to go to bed pissed? more likely to want to fuck your partner or feel like your soul was scooped out?

Who on earth thinks that manipulation and lies are great replies to anything? Even a fuck buddy will tire of you if you treat her like shit for the few moments you're actually exchanging thoughts.

>"You never listen to me."
>ask if there's something she wants to talk about

>“How may girls have you been with?”
>don't list names, don't dance around the question, just admit that you're somewhat inexperienced or a bit of a manwhore if that's the case

>“Come hang out with me and my friends.”
>agree, the kind of girl i want to date wants to get to know me before taking the dick and it's a great sign if she introduces me to friends and family

>“I hate you!” means that either you're an asshole or she is

manipulation and lies? what makes you think anyone has the right to know 100% about you at the drop of the hat? that kind of entitlement is scary. clearly these are questions that come up in early interactions. genuine answers can come later.

treating her like shit? any of these are said in a way that makes it obvious you're joking. smiling or deadpan, you don't talk like a cunt. that excludes the “stop staring at me” one, which isn't.

all of these replies serve to make you more attractive because they're not following some bland interview-type date. you don't need to memorize lines, just get in the spirit of thinking you're awesome and any girl would die to be with you (even if it ain't true! you hew to that script). there is literally nothing wrong with having extreme amounts of fun and infecting her with it.

which is the more fun date, the one that follows each of her questions with strict answers like their life depended on it, telling her about their 401k and boring job shit, or the one who's catty, jerkish, ridiculous, mysterious and fun?

>“I hate you!” means that either you're an asshole or she is

god no, i got told this all the time, especially in my last 3yr relationship. "i hate you" said when she's smiling or laughing is obviously not a declaration of hatred.

Eh you should feel sorry for them and their readers more than anything else. They, at some point, decided that the solution to their sexual frustration and need for validation was to see dating as a zero sum game in which you extract sex and validation from basically spiritually inert, malleable females, and, in so doing, have trapped themselves in an emotional scarcity mentality that will keep them from being capable of building anything with another person. They literally traded the ability to express yourself naturally and all the intimacy it allows for a pat on the back at having collected a woman as tho it were an achievement. They're like poor people who think that having flashy jewelry will convince people that they're rich - to everyone who isn't poor, they look like they put the cart before the horse and missed the point completely.

Wittgenstein was gay wasn't he?

I like Steve Jabba. Used to read his stuff a lot. Its what Elliot Roger used to read when he was alive and I believe Jabba is the best in what he is doing

youtube.com/watch?v=SenydNYKHWo picking up a milf slut by talking about bestiality

authenticpua.com/ his site. I bought his book. I could share it with you, if you would like.

I just checked his website. He changed it quite a bit. Looks like one of those """ has science gone to far""" scams to be honest. Whatever, if you are interested check out his blog and start from the last page.

go read paper towns then dont be the beta orbiter in the book that is based on john green

I have sex daily, sometimes twice a day. I'm not going to make my partner feel insecure so I can trick her into sex, if that's what you're saying. I don't want to make her prove that she's a better girl than big-titted Jane because hey, she's willing to take it up the ass.

I don't know about you but I don't have sex to distract myself from my shitty relationship. I have sex because I'm happy in the relationship. In this case I fuck him because I love him, not because I'm angry that he's got the hots for Jane. The moment I see him flirting with Jane my soul gets scooped out, and while that doesn't put me in the mood for sex, I'll do it to please him anyway because acting insecure, jealous and whiny wouldn't exactly make me more desirable than Jane.

That doesn't mean I'm horny. Just desparate.

>lol books are magical brainwashing tools
>think of the children that are consenting adults
i thought nancy reagan was dead

You've been going on hard on the Veeky Forums guide to philosophy I see.

>I have sex daily, sometimes twice a day. I'm not going to make my partner feel insecure so I can trick her into sex, if that's what you're saying. I don't want to make her prove that she's a better girl than big-titted Jane because hey, she's willing to take it up the ass.

nice strawman you pulled out of your ass that in no way resembles what i said

>I don't know about you but I don't have sex to distract myself from my shitty relationship. I have sex because I'm happy in the relationship. In this case I fuck him because I love him, not because I'm angry that he's got the hots for Jane. The moment I see him flirting with Jane my soul gets scooped out, and while that doesn't put me in the mood for sex, I'll do it to please him anyway because acting insecure, jealous and whiny wouldn't exactly make me more desirable than Jane.

i don't know how to respond to this because your gender changed or something. if this is the dude's wife, i'm not talking about the male ever engaging the girl for sex, i'm saying the girl engages out of the fucking blue. i've been flirted with at a party unconsciously, created jealousy i wasn't aware of, and then taken to the next room to have a tongue shoved down my throat. there's nothing rational going on here.

>Just desparate.

don't get what this means

>still wanting a gf

get woke OP

But I already have a gf. It just happened, I was just being myself. I wanted books about sustaining relationships. Like Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus? Or is it too pleb?
Not that there is a problem with having a gf if both partners do not cling to each other and experience intimacy consciously.

Maybe I shouldn't read PUA and keep on being myself?

>sustaining relationships

get woke

I mean, it's a good way to avoid robots.

I find it quite pathetic that men can't see through "tits". Do they not realize how silly it is that it works so easily on them?

continue to B.E. yourself
never lie
sometimes withhold truth until opportune moments
come on very strong physically whenever you want to fuck
enjoy

You can describe mundane things in funny or interesting ways.

The tits are always there. The confidence isn't.

>The tits are always there.

you forget that willing to be noticed by women is being a fullon beta

I don't understand. Why are you so upset?

all women are whores desu, except my mum, she's a saint

t. Everyman

Does your frame of reference go back no further than the Reagan era? No, I want to bring back book burning execution in the public square.

Yes, I do think books are magical things. Wondrous things at the very least. There are good arguments for freedom of the press, and I've read many of them; but nobody who takes the question the least bit seriously has ever said that books cannot be dangerous.

book burning and* execution etc etc

>lol i'll pretend i'm an older pearl clutcher
>that way it looks like i'd just be one of the cunts imprisoning the marquis de sade
>that'll never make me look like a prose pleb and monolingual
you're like the worst kind of middle class white person, the kind we had to send protestantism to inbreed for a few generations in America to get this purely uncultured
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-idbqUzwxs

Ovid: The art of loving

he's pre HIV and she's two-and half lesbian experiences old in this picture.

Bump

which one?

neither the left nor the right description is entirely true, but the right is certainly wrong

Chateau is too far into asshole territory. It turns away nice girls. The approach is so far out that you're always wondering if you did the right thing and are never quite sure and that doubt can trip you up. Include tiny whisps of assholism when you're after a girl but not so much you don't have a clue where you are. And keep it light.

>It's just the idea that you read that titillates them. They usually don't give a fuck about it otherwise.

This is true. I've used academic stuff, literary/philosophical knowledge, and verbal intelligence as my main schtick to get laid for like a decade. I cannot tell you how many "sapiosexuals" I have basically just talked at until they put out. But they never reciprocate, at all. I am talking fucking actual PhD-holders in Psychology or Literature, and I know more about their field as a dilettante in a totally unrelated field.

So you just talk at them, and give them the occasional opportunity to chime in. Basically, set all the terms of the conversation, but give them little dangling opportunities for input, or ask for their input on shit that doesn't matter. You don't want to be completely one-sidedly obliterating them, so you don't want to ask what they actually think of some topic (even one within their field), because then they feel bad that they're a dumbshit. What you want to do is show off how much YOU know about that topic, and then carefully circumscribe their possible input so that any fucking retarded banal opinion or platitude they have is a valid contribution.

Alternatively, pick a subject you don't really know a lot about, but still way more than them because you actually have integrity. Then openly admit you're a dilettante, relatively often, and affect a kind of gay-ass wide-eyed wonder about the topic. Because you're repeatedly saying you know nothing, they can be like HAHA ME TOO LOL :P I REALLY GOT A LEARN MORE ABOUT IT XD! even though they know actual nothing.

The upshot is that the girl won't feel condescended to or bullied, or that you're showing off, which is effeminate. You want your dominance to be effortless. Women crave the feeling of being a subordinate, NOT the feeling of being completely destroyed by a superior. Especially the smart ones, or ones who think they're smart or will some day be smart pantsuits ladies. So, most rich girls in university, and most educated professionals.

The more superficially intelligent the girl, the bigger their inferiority complex. They know they are in a man's world and they are frankly in awe of intelligent men. Like, they actually have no idea how intelligence, passion, or depth work. At all. If you arrive on the scene and show that you are one of those people, it will trigger their memory-complex of all the weird passionate men and professors they met in college, whose knowledge and talent left them literally uncomprehending and in literal awe. Women don't see individual men, they see aggregate performances. If you mantle the appropriate performance, you're fucking in. They just assume you're God.

Ever see that episode Space Seed of the original Star Trek, where McGivers falls completely in love with Khan because he's walking charisma, and because she's an historian who associates ALL "charismatic gods" with Napoleon, Caesar, Hitler, etc.?

This guy's got it. Why do you text her so much though? Just text to meet and fuck

Kama Sutra

That is a sincere suggestion btw

Is whore an insult?

>be human
>take care of basics like social skills, hygiene and whatever else
>have some positive qualities
>have limited amount of negative qualities or at least the skills to hide them
>communicate with people
>eventually hook up with a girl

So basically a human being with "flaws" and a dog that looks like a human? Decisions, decisions.