Any recommendation on cryptology publications?
Cryptology Publications:
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
coursera.org
cisco.com
irs.gov
etsi.org
cryptome.org
economist.com
engineering.stanford.edu
alltekmarine.com
continuouswave.com
saab.com
aishealth.com
linkedin.com
storagecraft.com
emc.com
nist.gov
eff.org
thehackernews.com
akardam.net
csc.villanova.edu
aircrack-ng.org
aircrack-ng.org
nayuki.io
codeproject.com
people.uncw.edu
stackoverflow.com
codeproject.com
ww1.microchip.com
dreamincode.net
ubuntuforums.org
kalitoolsguide.com
offensive-security.com
counton.org
cs.mtu.edu
crypto.interactive-maths.com
extremetech.com
arstechnica.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
xpreeli.com
safaribooksonline.com
econinfosec.org
securelist.com
hive.ccs.neu.edu
veracrypt.codeplex.com
zdnet.com
theintercept.com
zdnet.com
howtogeek.com
hackaday.com
scribd.com
cisco.com
csrc.nist.gov
digitaltrends.com
uncw.edu
wired.com
academia.edu
rtl-sdr.com
bgr.com
arstechnica.com
sans.org
auditscripts.com
support.sas.com
sascommunity.org
www2.sas.com
en.wikipedia.org
utmb.edu
csrc.nist.gov
csrc.nist.gov
electronics.howstuffworks.com
viasat.com
darkreading.com
inmarsat.com
klabs.org
yahoo.com
scmagazine.com
hughes.com
tiaonline.org
pcisecuritystandards.org
telegraph.co.uk
theregister.co.uk
mathcs.emory.edu
wired.com
intelsat.com
gps.gov
dis.arkansas.gov
eprint.iacr.org
gsi.nist.gov
pcisecuritystandards.org
msdn.microsoft.com
msdn.microsoft.com
social.technet.microsoft.com
cse.wustl.edu
brighthub.com
youtube.com
cis.usouthal.edu
twitter.com
bump
Bump
Yeah I have some.
Titles and authors?
Not of titles and authors, just cryptology publications.
I was asking you for their:
What do you mean by that?
Veeky Forums really can be full of useless shitposters sometimes can't it, Fagnon?
I agree. I especially hate people who pretend they're interested in learning something but can't even look up a textbook by themselves.
>Implying I didn't.
>Implying the Veeky Forums Science Wiki's cryptology list isn't anemic.
>Implying that knowledge from a knowledgable source isn't useful.
Fucking hell, you're dense.
cisco.com
irs.gov
etsi.org
engineering.stanford.edu
alltekmarine.com
continuouswave.com
aishealth.com
linkedin.com
storagecraft.com
emc.com
nist.gov
Thank you for the useful posts.
thehackernews.com
akardam.net
csc.villanova.edu
aircrack-ng.org
aircrack-ng.org
nayuki.io
codeproject.com
people.uncw.edu
stackoverflow.com
codeproject.com
ww1.microchip.com
dreamincode.net
ubuntuforums.org
offensive-security.com
counton.org
cs.mtu.edu
crypto.interactive-maths.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
xpreeli.com
safaribooksonline.com
econinfosec.org
securelist.com
hive.ccs.neu.edu
veracrypt.codeplex.com
zdnet.com
theintercept.com
zdnet.com
howtogeek.com
hackaday.com
scribd.com
csrc.nist.gov
digitaltrends.com
uncw.edu
wired.com
wired.com
academia.edu
rtl-sdr.com
bgr.com
sans.org
auditscripts.com
sascommunity.org
www2.sas.com
en.wikipedia.org
utmb.edu
csrc.nist.gov
csrc.nist.gov
electronics.howstuffworks.com
viasat.com
inmarsat.com
klabs.org
yahoo.com
scmagazine.com
hughes.com
tiaonline.org
telegraph.co.uk
theregister.co.uk
mathcs.emory.edu
wired.com
intelsat.com
gps.gov
dis.arkansas.gov
gsi.nist.gov
pcisecuritystandards.org
msdn.microsoft.com
msdn.microsoft.com
That's quite the comprehensive post, thank you.
Anytime homie, learn all the things, and then give it away to a super AI and make it learn from your behaviors and have it do it a billion times faster than you before it even finishes learning/simulating this process.
And then, it'll replace me?
replace you if that becomes your job maybe, otherwise it'll just become the base layer/foundation for some sort of strange but inevitable economy/society based on information and digital identities.
The future is scary.
The inception of the Atom has shown humanity that has been our policies and duties that protect us and not our technologies. We must evolve as a social society if we are going to withstand and give credence to the exponentially growing sector of autonomous machinery .
atom bomb
That's true, though doesn't that limit humanity?
in what way?
guys,lets say that alice and bob wanna set public RSA keys and they select e=17. alice wants the modulus n to be of the form p! where p is a prime, and bob wants to make it of the form p^2 * q, where p and q are primes, whos choice is better and how should they choose their p and/or q values to make tehir RSA setup strong against factoring attacks?
Alicia says hi.
By enforcing extra laws to proscribe for newer and innovatie f technologies? For instance the atom bomb and unwarranted reluctancy toward nuclear power.
in my opinion evolution is not just about enforcement but about interpretation and understanding. The first layer of the OSI layer model imo is the human layer. A lot of people fail to understand or to try to improve on that.
I see a future similar to this: youtube.com
Well in my country, United Kingdom, they are implementing programming into primary and secondary education. I suppose that's a step forward?
It should be a second language in my opinion. But that'll change, it'll be similar to learning cursive in my opinion. With the sophistication of AI learning, we could have far easier/more intuitive IDE's that could take in voice inputed slang/jargon and understand it. Kind of like Jarvis from Iron Man, without the fancy interface, although that interface has lots of potential as well.
It's basically like taking steps forward on a treadmill while you're taking turns with your workout buddy on changing its power supply and RPM's.
And now you're making me regret my educational and professional focus on nuclear engineering, though I do know: Matlab, C++; Lua, Python and LaTeX.
You could use that knowledge to facilitate that outcome for public education/non-profit or for businesses. Aiming at the bulls-eye and hitting it are two different parts of the equation.
You can also take it to the next lever and combine it with NLP's to create microprocessors that analyze different language and conversations and translate them for you verbally for international duologue involving security and/or different cultures/dialects.
Possibly one way to get to that level is to first reach that intuitive IDE system, and have it backup/learn from its input and combine it on some sort of server for data/pattern analysis. Basically using one free/nonprofit idea for the more sophisticated idea. Have the IDE learn from the input it receives. Publish it for different languages, then combine the input from the various languages at some corporate hq and analyze it, and produce a microprocessor that can translate the variety of sounds and verify/compare it in the programming form.
Using this idea: cis.usouthal.edu
and creating classes/lessons based off of it for the everyday person, having it become improved continuously while an AI monitors it/learns from it.
Get to the point where jargon can be converted into code. Have a bunch of people program with jargon in different languages in classrooms all over the world. Study the code and the jargon at HQ and analyze it, create a microprocessor based on that analysis, use it to translate real-time conversations for info sec and international dialogue.
Basically this could bypass the language conversion process by converting the inputed voice into code and then outputting it back in the desired language, but the amount of data received from a large sample group could allow for direct conversations. I guess what would vary would be the strength and the speed of the microchip and the amount of latency involved in each option. More than one company could manifest from this idea depending on which avenue of approach they'd like to take from it.
You could also receive entire conversations in code and then input them back into the program whenever you'd like to have that conversation again, thus conserving data on some scale.
If the processor did all of the work at the satellite stage rather than the towers, you wouldn't even need to distribute new devices, just new channels for data. Or you could put it in an App but that could hinder the security potential.
I'm bumping this because I think this idea has a lot of potential.
You'll never learn cryptography. I can tell.
Good advice, user.
That's sheer genius, user.
Seconded.
>Run out of valid point, attempt to attack OP.
Impressive user, your lack of creativity isn't surprising.