Books that women will never understand

Nobody's impressed by you mindlessly spouting /r9k/ vernacular. Your thread contributes nothing and history will not remember you.

Huge female fanbase.

I'm not the OP, calling someone a roastie and waiting for an aggressive reply is the easiest and quickest way to indentify roasties.

What is a roastie?

I've been on this site for 10 years and never heard that term

A women who won't sleep with obese manchildren.

I'm not certain but I think it refers to a woman who has had an excessive number of sexual partners, and is "worn out".

Time have changed gramps, the old joke that "there are no girls on the internet" is over and done with.

>I've been on this site for 10 years and never heard that term
Shut the fuck up

I'm an oldfag too and I don't really know either, but its the robot word for girls. Obviously out of spite, although no one really knows what it means so the word kinda just falls flat

this is good

you're stooping to their level. You could learn from do better

Read it you fucking dork. Last summer I read it right after a female friend and we had quality conversations about it. Anyone who knows anything about literature will recognize it for the masterpiece that it is or at least be too afraid to trash it.

Anyone who isn't into literature will have no fucking clue what it's about or even care what you're reading when they see it isn't Game of Thrones or some YA fic they've read.

It refers to a woman's labia, specifically large "beef curtain" style labia. The visual similarity between aforementioned labia and roast beef is striking. A "roastie" is an ugly floppy pussy.

Is Lolita reallllly the best example you have? Really? Like women find it pretty obvious what's going on. I'd ask if men understand it when so many seem easily convinced it's not rape and beautiful romance by the rapist narrator.
I'll admit I just don't seem to get the hype around Tolkien so you might be right.

>it's yet another:
>ITT books women will never understand
>all of them desu fan
>fuck off virgins
>spotted the cuck
>thread
why are you so predictable Veeky Forums

day after day... like ants on my chessboard

>le so predictable meme
How predictable.

>le redundant (you)
you never disappoint

But lots of women like fantasy

only when it's not a woman dying, that would be sexist

>(you) posting.
*titters contemptuously*

Yeah I'm not an r9k faggot, but you can't deny a vagina gets stretched out when it repeeatedly stretched out when it gets STRETCHED OUT by cocks pounding it. Girls should be able to fuck whoever they want, but that doesn't change the facts.

tolkien is garbage

girls that have a wrinkly "used" porn star vagina, thus assoiciated with being sluts

are you a female or just a faggot?

>best ever fantasy author
>literally devoted his life to language and vocabulary
>has GOAT prose
>created like 30 different, complete, logical languages
>had first person experience on war, since he fought on both WWI and WWII, the reason why his war narrations are top tier

You are a retard.

>muh autistic fake languages!!
>muh war vet!
>muh babbys first fantasy

>not an argument
>not an argument
>not an argument
well looks like you just surrendered to that guy harder than a Frenchie

Embarrassing post. The only point of any substance in your post is that he has "GOAT" prose, which you did not qualify and is demonstrably false.

You're assuming I'm the op from before, which I'm not. You failed to counter his arguments though.

>unrivaled ability to create language, history, and myth for his universe
>not a point of any substance

it's one thing to say you don't like tolkien, but to say he's garbage just makes you a fucking retard

There are no arguments to counter, Tolkien's personal life and made up languages do not make him a good author.

People would see the title and be weirded out

Reading don't mean comprehend

>le am i cool now guise' meme

Kys

KO

No but prose and writing skills do.

Excellent analysis.

Just buy the Everyman's Library edition of it. It's a pic of Nabokov looking all pensive and shit on the cover. Anybody who's remotely familiar with the book title will think you're patrician, and everybody else will assume you're reading some dope, deep shit written by a man gracefully touching dying roses while he glares softly at them. Don't fuck with any of the paperback copies. They're all creepy as fuck.

This one is okay too, I have this one. I think the one in OP is the nicest cover though, even if it is creepy.