Women are more likely to be published than men

>women are more likely to be published than men
>minorities are more likely to be published than whites
>All great writers are still white and male
fuck

Other urls found in this thread:

electricliterature.com/straight-white-women-run-publishing-according-to-new-survey-d0f8ea227d5f#.l7ty3zdv9
therumpus.net/2012/06/where-things-stand/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It seems so obvious in my mind that the pandering is actually making them less likely to create anything interesting, because it's lowering the bar of quality and putting less pressure on them to be truly excellent. But everyone else in the world seems to think that pandering rules and is the way to fix every social problem, so what do I know.

we -- as white males -- are simply inherently superior and more suited to the expression of an aesthetic vision.

Women and nonwhites are barely even human, they lack any depth and comprehension of the human condition.

Take the redpill

I bet you bitch and moan when other people play with a handicap in golf, too, pussy

>tfw I hit from the women's tee

Women and nonwhites are simply not mentally and intellectually geared towards the creation of great art..

Who created Western civilization? White men. Women were freeloading or confined to domestic matters, while nonwhites were living in mudhuts the world over

>So I'm still unpacking Claire Vaye Watkins' potentially game changing essay, "On Pandering," going almost a section per day. What I'm thinking so far: that while she recognizes how much she was pandering to the white man, we writers of colour spend way too much of our lives pandering to the white woman. I've mentioned this before, how there is such a thing as "the critically acclaimed story." You see it occasionally in certain highbrow magazines and journals. Astringent, observed, clipped, wallowing in its own middle-style prose and private ennui, porn for certain publications. And I knew from early on how to write the kind of story that would get published. Honestly, had I followed that formula (or style?) if I pandered to a cultural tone set by white women, particular older white female critics, I would have had 10 stories published by now. There's an award that I have been a finalist for, more than once, and in both situations I was the only person who knew that I wouldn't win. I looked at the winner and I look at the judges and both followed exactly the same aesthetic. And looked the same as well. I knew right there, what they were looking for in a book and I knew the winner fulfilled it with flying colours, even if it wasn't that great a book. The last contest I judged, the initial favourite was yet again, "bored suburban white woman in the middle of ennui, experiences keenly observed epiphany." And though we'll never admit it, every writer of colour knows that they stand a higher chance of getting published if they write this kind of story. We just do. Anyway, still reading.

Big publishing is almost totally geared at whether white women within between the 20th and 80th percentile of wealth and education will consume it. Ethnicity or gender of actual authors doesnt matter, its whether you pander to what marlon james says above. Hate how he says it, but at least look at the reality.

[citation needed]

electricliterature.com/straight-white-women-run-publishing-according-to-new-survey-d0f8ea227d5f#.l7ty3zdv9

Rich straight white women dominate the publishing industry

this

Anyone who is simple enough to apply a "pill" color to their world view needs to take this pill

Just another instance of the white man being oppressed nowadays.

It's sad. I fear for my white male children in a future that has conceded more ground to the anti-white anti-men globalists

>women are more likely to be published than men
cite source
>minorities are more likely to be published than whites
cite source
>All great writers are still white and male
lol

White men dont read unfortunately.

We have been oppressed and demasculinized to the point at which we are forced to spend our tiem watching anime and playing video games while jerking off to cuck porn.

It's a ploy to make us sterile and worthless, so we'll be bred out of existence.

Thanks, leftists

But all the best readers are white man.
Bloom, me, the list just goes on.

*men

Oops

>mfw there will literally never be a female Einstein, Plato, Shakespeare, or Bach

Enjoy being the second sex for eternity

Thats the lot of white men. We gave the world literally everything of any value, asked for nothing in return, and look how we're repaid. They (ethnics, women) are like spoiled children who terrorize their parents.

This. I see them as our children as well. Forgive them, for they see not what they do.

But the day of retribution will come.

The White Man will once again rise and ensalve the nonwhites, and confine women to the kitchen where they belong

Nartural order shall prevail

Bullshit identity politics have finally reached white trash. Congratulations, now you fucks can be as whiny as blacks and women.

Sage into oblivion. I can't wait until this fucking election is over.

Yes fucking stupid white males shut the fuck up and take it you stupid brutes, you opressed this world forever we are just taking back what belongs to us.

>mad on the internet

post your tits

>everyone can complain except the most oppressed and villified group in the world today - i.e. white males

It's unbelieavable. I have no doubt that there will be large scale public murders of white males to the cheers of feminists and leftist cucks everywhere

Any white European male that doesn't write under a Chinese female pen name is asking to go unpublished forever.

>white European male

They are literally being genocided as we speak. They have more important things to worry about right now

>there will be
The Boer in South Africa are being genocided to the applause of "feminists and leftists cucks".

You guys ever wonder what psychological need your violent fantasies and persecution complexes serve?

Take the redpill and see the truth for yourself.

We are being systemically genocided in the name of leftism

I'm willing to stipulate that whites are being genocided for the sake of leftism. Sure, why not? My point is that your love of wallowing in your genocide is pure, unfiltered, 100% ressentiment.

I can't tell how many layers this thread is on but I'm worried that it may actually be zero.

>I'm willing to stipulate that whites are being genocided for the sake of leftism.

Then you've been redpilled. Now help save the white race by engaging in the struggle for whiteness. Deus Vult my brother, and godspeed.

>Bloom
>white

Thread was made on 2

White men are disproportionately more likely to submit their work for publication, and they are disproportionately more likely to be rejected.

How is that unfair?

proof??

>White men are disproportionately more likely to submit their work for publication
White men are disproportionately more likely to think their shit writing is good simply based on the fact that they are white males and therefore innately superior
>and they are disproportionately more likely to be rejected
and then act surprised when their white superpowers never kicked in while writing, or more likely, complain that their genius has gone unrecognized.

wah wah gtfo

I'm making conjecture, same as OP.

Factually, published authors are disproportionately white and male.
therumpus.net/2012/06/where-things-stand/
Regardless of what you make of that, if you accept that the pool of published authors does not perfectly represent the demographics of society at large, it's silly to claim discrimination when the pool of rejected authors is similarly unrepresentative.

Factually, publishers are disproportionately white women. Suspicious.

#BlackBooksMatter

Only SJW's think this.

I appreciate the fact I can get ahead easier, but I don't think its necessary.

It's because white men are ten times smarter, more creative, more aesthetically minded, and more deep than women and nonwhites.

White men are disproportionally being denied publishing to serve leftist interests in terms of making people believe there is some kind of equality of the races and sexes, which is a blatant lie

at least you guys fostered Veeky Forums - the height of white maledom

>Ironic detachment or idiocy are the only reasons anyone could have for holding these opinions

You got a long way to go, kid.

The height of white maledom is going to the moon, inventing medicine, creating the aeroplane, building the pyramids, and inventing philosophy.

What did women and nonwhites do? Fucking nothing.

p-peanuts, sir

>aeroplane
I chuckled

>we
>they

How does it feel knowing you will die without ever contributing anything to the world whatsoever? How does it feel to take the accomplishments of other individuals as your own in order to validate your identity/existence? :~)

i don't know, why don't you tell me?

It feels great to know that their inherently superior blood runs in my veins, while shitflnging and rape is in yours

The day of the rope will come

>Endlessly vilified for belonging to a group
>Mocked for using personal pronouns associated with membership of that very group

Thanks, modernity.

It feels great. I share the blood of kings and my potential is limitless. I have to live up to their legacy.

How does it feel being part of a gender / race that never invented a single thing? Aren't you worried the problem might be genetic?

...

I would feel bad for the people who honestly don't understand why they get flak of for proclaiming their White Pride. but I watch the race with them Sundays, and there are no perceptible hard feelings.

loser

...

If white men aren't allowed to feel pride in the things their forefathers did, then why should they be made to feel shame?

LEFTKEKS ABSOLUTELY AND UTTER BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

Are you implying that all white people are your forefathers? And who's asking you to feel shame?

>And who's asking you to feel shame?
The cultural marxist feminist-Judaic-liberal anti-white agenda.

That sounds like a thing that exists.

How hard did you swallow the bluepill?

is this thread ironic

Probably not the first one to mention it but you answered your nonquestion yourself.
If you publish people more based on their sex/race and not on the quality of their works then obviously the ones getting published being white males are going to be great. I think it's a nice filter. No one should complain about challenges.

Okay, let's get into the nitty gritty. Where is the agenda written down? If it's purely transmitted by word of mouth, who is the originator? Where is the evidence that it isn't merely a convenient fiction to explain a feeling of unrealized superiority?

stfu about my physicsfu

Come to /pol/ and we'll show you how deep the rabbit hole goes

But I like my soul.

i hate this shit
i'm going to tear it all up i swear boys
i'm going to make the kids read

>Stormfags desperately trying to turn popular opinion towards them through wafer-thin rhetoric and transparent diction

lol