What is some alt-right lit?

/pol/ have to leave

>muh boogeyman

>the protocols of the elders of Zion

*cringes

How to Eat Fried Worms

funny platitude considering the alt right ideology is based on the fear of their own fabricated boogeymen

>protocols of the elders of zion
>turner diaries
stopped reading there
you /pol/ kiddies are too good

>Alt-right
>Literature

Pick one

more like alt-wrong

>Joyce and Faulkner trigger the alt-right

The sad part is this is too sincere to be parody.

:^)

I'm writing a novella for the alt right.

It's about a guy who gets beaten up by a black guy in highschool, admires rich people, and pretends his trailer is a villa.

He blames the Jews for his frequent firings, fucks transgenders but calls gays degenerate, and deep down is very lonely and sad cuz he has the millennial ideals, but they dont mix well with his conservative adoption of identity politics and racism.

At the end he meets an SJW tranny, and they realize that they both are insecure losers who don't know what they want to be, and have bizzare hate sex in the mansion they snuck into.

He was praising Joyce and Faulkner.

He was saying language has degraded since then.

Everything said there is true.

nice, didn't know A Confederacy of Dunces was getting the abridged treatment.

>Skips Hitler

Do you have the one with the guy claiming that soap and basic hygiene is a jewish conspiracy?

I'd probably call it, "Kill yourself" because the main character would always say that. It would be a fitting tribute

The Book of the New Sun

>He was praising Joyce and Faulkner.

He wasn't. I was in that thread ages ago and remember him shit-talking Finnegans Wake

How To Be A Stupid Gay Faggot And Then Kill Yourself

counter-currents.com/

The alt-right don't fucking read books, I'd just tell them to find something they enjoy and try not to read it with any political bias whatsoever.

HP Lovecraft, Celine, Dostoevsky, and Houellebecq are good choices.

Btw, you might want to check out this book, OP:

amazon.com/Artists-Right-K-R-Bolton/dp/193596514X

>The alt-right don't fucking read books
AltRight/Dark Enlightenment are such fucking spook names

On Women - Schopenhauer

>The alt-right don't fucking read books.

Lol. Are leftists capable of making a remotely accurate characterization of anyone who disagree with them? Alt-Righters can't be Evola-reading autists and dumb rednecks at the same time.

>I'd just tell them to find something they enjoy and try not to read it with any political bias whatsoever.

Muh bias.

Considering they don't remotely follow the tenets of Evola's occult beliefs they're probably just dumb rednecks.

>i know you are but what am i?

>troglodyte memelord virgins
>literature

Not even a leftist but damn is the alt right cringe.

Someone post the Tokyo /pol/ meetupwith that fatass with dirty fingernails.

>Evola
muh magic

Praise kek

Finnegans Wake is a meme though.

It's the harsh noise of Literature. Nobody actually enjoys it.

Chris Bradford is quite a good alt-right author. Helped define some of the earlier movement, if I recall correctly.

...

It's kinda funny how shitty the knowledge of Aquinas the person who made this had.
The problem he had with Jews is that they were the only persons who did banking at the time, mostly lending money with interest, which was the thing he wanted to prevent. It wasn't something tied to Jews because they were Jews.
And he was right of course.

silly

Das Kapital
/pol/ hates Marx and Marxists.
/pol/ hates the alt-right an consider themselves national socialists. Of course /pol/ isn't one person but it's obvious the latter is the huge majority.

>People don't enjoy harsh noise
>People don't enjoy Joyce's prose
Fuck off pleb

I think this graphic is bait, not only because of what said about Aquinas but also because it attributes a quote by a character clearly portrayed as self-serving and untrustworthy to Marlowe himself.

Interestingly enough The Jew of Malta would contradict a great number of /pol/ (or alt-right or whatever) talking points because it shows very clearly the Christian persecution of the Jews - Ferneze imposing the levy on the Jewry of Malta - and attacks traditional Christian institutions: the government of Malta, the church (one of the priests laments after Abigail's death that he didn't get a chance to fuck her) and the Christian citizenry. Moreover, it does appear from the play that the only honourable/noble group are the Muslims, the Calymath playing the role of the good Renaissance prince better than almost any other character in Marlowe's oeuvre.

Despite its name and the most immediate, shallow interpretations of it "The Jew of Malta" is not a play that exhibits the extreme social conservatism and anti-Muslim sentiment of the alt-right as it appears to me.

What strikes me is that /pol/ doesn't know about The Jews by Hilaire Belloc. Albeit it portrays most Jews in a very positive light, but if anything for the meme value and a few quotes about their elites and role in anti-Chritian revolutions, like the Russian, French and Italian.

Evolutionary Psychology is a psudeo-science created (ironically) by Jews

>Everyone I don't like doesn't read lmao

Why do leftists do this? Seems like all they care about is posturing to look intelligent. Very insecure imo

>an alt right posts anime
didnt see that one coming

>Why do leftists do this?
It isn't about leftists, it's about /pol/fags being uneducated faggots. Their retardetion is equally dumb if you are a marxist, Catholic, neocon, monarchist or just about anything else on the "right".

kek
Because if /pol/ read then they wouldn't be talking out of their arse on so many different issues

there is literally nothing wrong with anime

do you have proofs to substantiate that claim?

and if you read culture of Culture of Critique you wouldn't be talking out of your ass about the jews

I always thought that people loved Minions because they were banal losers who could fit anything, basically.

Both, by the way.

>there is literally nothing wrong with anime
The ones you like are essentially pedophile bait for idiots.
>do you have proofs to substantiate that claim?
The fact that you contradict Catholic doctrine, that you deny the essential doctrines of liberalism (which you probably cannot tell apart from progressivism), that you insert race into everything even if it's completely irrelevant to things such as monarchism, the fact that you do not understand virtue or the natural law also connected with it and so on.
The only groups of people who would agree with your general sentiment are nazi larpers.
>and if you read culture of Culture of Critique you wouldn't be talking out of your ass about the jews
You can read a book on Jews and disagree with it and in fact deny everything it stands for.
And for the record, I've probably read more books on them than you.

>The fact that you contradict Catholic doctrine, that you deny the essential doctrines of liberalism (which you probably cannot tell apart from progressivism), that you insert race into everything even if it's completely irrelevant to things such as monarchism, the fact that you do not understand virtue or the natural law also connected with it and so on.
Maybe because they aren't Catholics, Liberals, or Monarchists? And maybe because the entire focus of the alt-right is about race and preventing the demographic shift? Hmmm...

>marxists are of the right
you wot m8

My claim wasn't that they are, my claim was that they are uneducated philistines whose ideas are almost universally rejected by relevant thinkers of the "right", be it Aquinas and Chesterton, Hobbes and Locke or Kirk and Burke.
Phrased it wrong. They are seen as retards from the left as well as right, both being very wide terms.
Any political stance you may have will inevitably conclude that they are just dumb larpers or at best just people who enjoy very ironic dank memes.

Its almost as if the "right" isn't a monolith and they aren't obligated to adhere to whatever you have predefined as their relevant thinkers.

Regardless of how wide I define it, /pol/fags have no thinkers, unless we count idiots read only by teenagers and basement dwellers.

Out of curiosity, why doesn't Veeky Forums like /pol/? btw /pol/ isn't alt-right.

NRx checking in.

Praise Nick land and moldbug okay?

Heidegger, Hegel and deluze are okay.

All novels by white authors are okay. Right wing poetry is superior

If you don't have 120iq just be a populist alt right.

If you have sub 100iq you are most likely a nigger or left wing or both.

Because they shit up the board with women are dumb xD and fuck niggers threads, their power of expression is clearly inferior to your average poster here with a lot of their memes and people take the bait.
When they come for recommendations they don't actually read them.

They seem to only care about what people write on twitter, what people write on reddit and tumblr, Disney movies, and interracial relationships.

Then there's the Nazi ideology.

Because their brand of identity politics is as obnoxious as that of those they deplore

convergence of catastrophes

Because they are too stupid to realize that they are just identity poltics except in a way that reinforces existing hierarchies rather than fights them.

I consider Marx and Friedman to be crucial in the study of economics and politics. You can't refute one without understanding the other

Best history books you've read?
Both non-fiction and historical fiction?

this, /pol/ is just another "special snowflake" identity politics flavor

>too stupid to realize that they are
Wait really? I'm pretty sure everyone their is aware that they are, it's just they believe that their brand of identity politics has proven itself sustainable and time-tested unlike any other's identity.

No it isn't its about a realistic fear of one's race dying out.

Inb4 why care
Fuck off

>one's race
how is that not a spooky feature that makes you a special snowflake without having to accomplish anything of value in your actual life?

Leader of the opposition did want it

>makes you a special snowflake
Literally the opposite, it means you're one of many
>without having to accomplish anything of value in your actual life
Literally the opposite - you're now take on new responsibilities as a member of the group to ensure its survival
How do you even arrive to that? It's not "Oh I'm white therefore I have IQ over 160 and is responsible for every scientific accomplishment in history", it's "I'm white and I'm better start doing everything in my power to reverse white genocide"

> I ... is ...
mfw accidentally write in AAVE while posting about white supremacy

it's literally and identity, as you just explain it's just picking pre-packed responsibilities and duties because you can't figure out any of your own without somebody else doing the thinking for you

>literally and identity
So? Your ethnicity is part of yours as well whether you like it or not.

>it's just picking pre-packed responsibilities ... because you can't figure out any of your own
Doesn't follow - you can pick some you can make up some others for yourself if you so wish. Having some responsibilities inherited as you realize your social identity does not prevent you from having other responsibilities and duties whatsoever. Devoting yourself in part to a group goal does not totally rid you of personhood/uniqueness/intelligence/agency etc.

And it's still a choice to make and the end result doesn't dictate how you arrive to it, one may just be a retard joining an internet fad because of memes or one might be making a calculated decision that benefits them personally where you seem to imply that everyone just joins "muh whites" movement for no other reason than it being an identity politics movement that matches their identity.

Pepes I have known and loved: A memetic love story