Teach Humanity

...

>乳ブタJK肉便器!!!
>Cow tits high schooler girls made into meat toilets!!!

reported to the FBI

This except switch out the chemistry and the DE's with maybe Tolstoy and Orwell or something similar so that the little fella isn't an insufferable autist.

Kant, Niesztch, Hegel, Marx, Plato, Averroès, Shin Zu, Machiavel, Boole, Poincaré.

10 Agatha Christie novels selected at random.

...

...

...

>all those DE books
>no Arnol'd
user...

...

is it better than tenenbaum and pollard's?
if so, care to share a copy?

nvm got it tanks user

Sipser - Introduction to the Theory of Computation
Campbell - Biology
Vonnegut - Slaughterhouse 5
Laozi - Daodejing
Confucius - Analects
Zhuangzi
Aeschylus - Oresteia
Zinn - A People's History of the United States
Miyazaki - Dark Souls
Blow - The Witness

It's a lot different. Arnol'd's text is certainly not introductory, but has lots of interesting insights and stuff you won't find elsewhere.

it's a rubbish textbook becasue it doesn't have any problems

reads more like a monograph

This has no bearing whatsoever with the usefulness of the book and its insights on differential equations though.

i'd say maybe its useful for those extra tidbits it gives then, exercises can be found on loads of other textbooks

>This has no bearing whatsoever with the usefulness of the book
do you read what you're writing? of course it does, what a ridiculous thing to suggest.

it's excellent as an extended paper/monograph on ODEs but calling it a good textbook is just daft.

I never once said it was a good textbook, are you confusing me with someone else? I said Arnol'd's text, a text is just a book. Book as in something you read. Did you even read my posts?

I think you're the confused one mate, you said the lack of problems has nothing to do with the usefulness of the book

that's both stupid and wrong

Is English your secondary language? Good job glossing over >and its insights on differential equations. Just because Arnol'd's ODE has no exercises doesn't mean it's a bad read. I never even used the word textbook. Go and re-read my posts.

>Just because Arnol'd's ODE has no exercises doesn't mean it's a bad read.
that's your opinion

what's not opinion is the fact that a good set of problems would improve any mathematics text, paper or book. you can stop the weaselling around and drop the textbook elitism. just because part of your post is correct, doesn't mean the idiotic bit about problems isn't.

that kind of attitude is why so many textbooks end up with a shitty set of problems and no solutions, and consequently end up being a proper pain in the arse.

think you need to pull your head out a bit

Wow what a retard. When did I ever say that a good set of problems didn't enhance a book? Of course it does you moron. Also, a book is just a general written work. Once again, you're putting words in my mouth. We have the exact same opinion so why are we even arguing? I think you should stop assuming things based on my posts and actually read them.

>When did I ever say that a good set of problems didn't enhance a book?

right here
>>it's a rubbish textbook becasue it doesn't have any problems
>This has no bearing whatsoever with the usefulness of the book

A book, not a conventional textbook. Nice reading comprehension senpai.

you used "book" in both cases mate. and arnold (the book we're arguing about) is a textbook (which is also a book) anyway and would 100% be improved with a good set of problems/solution.

don't be such a mong, it's ok to be wrong on the internet.

The Bible
Plato's Complete Works, Hackett Publishing
The Golden Sayings, Epictetus
Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand
Richest Man in Babylon, George S. Clayson
The Intelligent Investor, Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis, Benjamin Graham
Trend Following, Micheal Covel
Principles of Economics, Gregory Mankiw
Basic Mathematics, Serge Lang

>This is actually really difficult. Ten books is too few, OP!

kek a heated argument is happening, fuck off, ruining my popcorn

Did you forget what this thread is for?

Go back to /pol/.

Required viewing: It artfully demonstrates that the question of human development vs environmental protection can't be reduced to a myopic good-vs-evil narrative. It's the thinking man's FernGully.

stop spamming the same garbage in every thread you disgusting pig

Now this is spam, you disgusting pig.

YOY more heated arguments - double trouble anons
MOAR POPCORNNNzzzzzzz

u cheeky cunt

>what's not opinion is the fact that a good set of problems would improve any mathematics text, paper or book
the whole point of reference texts are to be collection of facts, how would this benefit from having a bunch of contrived exercises?

A book in arithmetic and prealgebra
A book on introductory algebra
A book on intermediate algebra and trig
A book on calculus
A book on differential equations
A book on linear algebra
A book on introductory physics
A book on intermediate physics
A book on introductory biology
A book on introductory chemistry

Probably any peer-reviewed, open source copy with good reviews for all of them.

a reference text might have a collection of open problems related to each theorem

>Oxtoby
>not Pauling

A .pdf print out of Wikipedia
Archie and Jughead Double Digest
Playboy March 1996
Playboy March 1999
Cat in the Hat
Uncle Tom's Cabin
Playboy June 1996
Playboy June 1999
Playboy July 1999
Hustler July 1999

Daodejing, my niqqua.

"Zen Mind, Beginners Mind" is a great one too.

Pretty much this. Though I might swap Plato for Aristotle since he is generally easier to, especially for a child or teenager.