Did Big Bang came from nothing?

What's up Veeky Forumsentists. I just heard a Muslim idiot claiming that Big Bang isn't real because nothing can only create nothing.
What are some of most plausible theories about where that dense point of singularity came from?
So far I heard it could be older universe shrinking into one point and that our universe could be part of multiverse that existed since forever.
What do you think? I have just basic science understanding.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tVU8bhbQInw
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Huh, I recently had a muslim guy claiming all the great discoveries of the 19th and 20th centuries were from muslims (EM, relativity, quantum theory, computers). It is astounding how deluded people can be.

No one ever said "nothing" created the Big Bang. We don't actually know what started it, though some of the more wacky M-theorists and such claim it was the collision of higher-dimensional "membranes" that led to an explosive release of matter and energy, and the laws we observe are simple woven into the spacetime of that system.

There is absolutely no conclusive proof of this though, and the math/physical reasoning can be very shaky at times with it.

The theory you describe is called the "big crunch", and it is generally not considered the case by cosmologists nowadays. This is due to the solution of the Friedman equation being equal to zero. This, however, is only strongly inferred, not conclusively observed, as we can't accurately predict the energy density of the universe. This is ultimately due to a shortcoming of our instruments, and the limitations of the Hubble volume.

God did it \thread

Demonstrate your god exists, bro

Miracles

Miracles? What miracles?

so were did dose membrane cum from?

>that dense point of singularity
...was not "nothing".
Your idiot Muslim is an idiot.

da universe itself is da evidence.

life, bro.

>appearing before millions
>healing the blind, crippled, sick
>videotaped live on TV
youtube.com/watch?v=tVU8bhbQInw

>I don't understand life
>therefore miracle

The universe in which you say god exists in is evidence that god exists? That's not how logic works, bro

>responding to shit posting seriously
>acting smug while doing so

bro

Interesting, but do you think anecdotes are evidence?

its membranes all the way up senpai

>observations aren't evidence

but you can have joy/peace/love/truth/wisdom/new life/hope without fairytales

an·ec·do·tal
ˌanəkˈdōdl/
adjective
(of an account) not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research

an·ec·dote
ˈanəkˌdōt/
noun
a short and amusing or interesting story about a real incident or person.

Hitler was made up. All we have are anecdotes.

No, we have video evidence of his existence

Who the fuck knows. Maybe they didn't come from anywhere, and time is simply a spatial dimension to them. Maybe we experience time in a very specific way that doesn't apply to higher dimensional structures.

But where did that point came from?

We don't fucking know

Don't say 'God' because an all-knowing, all-powerful god doesn't make sense, bro

In this universe nothing fucking matters and doesn't make any damn sense.

The point can be God or absolutely nothing. Don't worry about it, you'll be dead before you find the answer.

Nobody really knows how the universe began.

The Universe is a simulation and the big bang was caused inside the RAM of the real computer. Mindblowing right XDDD?

No. Because the Universe the real computer is contained in should've been nothing at some point. If it isn't the "top layer", then whatever the "top layer" is should've came out of nothing at some point.

The fact that you're trying to imply that there is something, whatever it is, before the Big Bang that it came from, is irrelevant as the thing it came from also should've originated from somewhere, up to tracing the entire tree of "somewheres" that begins at "absolute emptiness". Whatever is creating our existence should've began from zero. What modern physics is simply doing is applying Occam's Razor and stating that "it is more probable to be just the Big Bang than the BB + something else".

occam's razor is complete nonsense:
it's simpler to say "god did it" than "there are tiny particles which pull the positively charged protons together, in spite of the well established fact that positive charges repell each other:

"god did it" implies that there is a separate (infinitely complex at that) system that came from nothing and caused the whole Universe, rather than simply the Universe coming from nothing. It's adding an unnecessary and unneeded step in the causation ladder

Nice try tho

Why must it be that the universe came from "nothing"?
All the matter in the universe seems like it's been there forever and sometimes changes form. It makes more sense to believe that it's always existed and doesn't need a "cause" for existing.

The real question is what is the underlying nature of interaction? What is causality? Why do things happen? Did everything come from one causal chain or are there multiple chains of causality affecting the world out there?

The universe doesnt need to "actually" be as big as it seems. We will never leave milky way galaxy so you could program the rest of the universe as a "movie" that needs only very little computing power. Hell, you would actually only need to program a couple of hundreds of light years from us because we will never go further.

The real miracle is that two different people produced such remarkably similar illustrations! Praise Eris.

We have video evidence of miracles

It happened because it had to have happened for us to be here posting in this thread.

Something had to exist, otherwise there could be no "nothing" either.