>unreliable narrators
Unreliable narrators
>unreliable readers
>unreliable writers
unreliable shitposters
>unreliable frog arrows
>reliable fellater
Isn't the fact that author makes the narrator "unreliable" make him more reliable than any other? How can we know any narrator is to be trusted, in any work? If anything, unreliable narrators let us know that they are not to be trusted.
But if he's narrating how do you know he's lying?
By not being a total idiot.
This is the whole "chaotic evil is the most predicable alignment cause they are always evil" faggotry.
Okay I laughed
this is stupid.
I wish I could force all writers to write from 3rd person limited omniscient perspective. Then they might actually develop some sense of plot, narrative and story structure.
>posting the white nationalist frog
Racism isn't allowed here, kids.
wew lad
>The whole story is being told to some random fag in a bar
it kills all suspense and I have only seen it subverted once
you should be more open minded
We don't take kindly to jewr kind around here. Nor anywhere else
Post examples of unreliable narrators done right
Holden Caulfield
>unreliable boards when it comes to thread quality
>First-person narration
Umineko
>unreliable broads when it comes to thread quality
I didn't marry a seamstress for shoddy woollens like these
>"non-linear storyline" when the author clearly made everything up as they went along
Kinbote.
Wittgenstein's Mistress did it right
Underrated
or it would have been ultra dull in linear form so they had it by moving shit around