Unreliable narrators

>unreliable narrators

>unreliable readers

>unreliable writers

unreliable shitposters

>unreliable frog arrows

>reliable fellater

Isn't the fact that author makes the narrator "unreliable" make him more reliable than any other? How can we know any narrator is to be trusted, in any work? If anything, unreliable narrators let us know that they are not to be trusted.

But if he's narrating how do you know he's lying?

By not being a total idiot.

This is the whole "chaotic evil is the most predicable alignment cause they are always evil" faggotry.

Okay I laughed

this is stupid.

I wish I could force all writers to write from 3rd person limited omniscient perspective. Then they might actually develop some sense of plot, narrative and story structure.

>posting the white nationalist frog

Racism isn't allowed here, kids.

wew lad
>The whole story is being told to some random fag in a bar
it kills all suspense and I have only seen it subverted once

you should be more open minded

We don't take kindly to jewr kind around here. Nor anywhere else

Post examples of unreliable narrators done right

Holden Caulfield

>unreliable boards when it comes to thread quality

>First-person narration

Umineko

>unreliable broads when it comes to thread quality

I didn't marry a seamstress for shoddy woollens like these

>"non-linear storyline" when the author clearly made everything up as they went along

Kinbote.

Wittgenstein's Mistress did it right

Underrated

or it would have been ultra dull in linear form so they had it by moving shit around