If evolution is real, then how come humans didn't evolve to be able to eat raw meat? Surely millions of hunters were killed after eating the raw meat of their prey, and thus humans would have started evolving to be able to eat it.
This is checkmate to anyone who believes in evolution.
This is some of the lowest tier bait ever, anyone who does not understand this, or falls for this. should put a gun in their mouth.
never heard of sushi?
Not an argument.
I meant raw meat we can't eat.
Part of the reason we evolved and became so intelligent was the ability to cook food, which in turn lead to an increase in the nutritional value of the food. Which lead to an increase demand for nutrients, which lead to hunting. Fire came before the hunter.
>wasting energy and dna space to produce enzymes you don't need
lol pleb
We can eat raw red meat actually. Are stomachs can digest and handle it just fine. You could literally go bite a live cow, chew and swallow the meat and be fine 9 times out of 10. We are only encouraged to cook it so we don't have to deal with other stuff that might be in the meat after having it sit around like maggots or if the animal was diseased.
That's kind of interesting, don't listen to . In fact, this actually reminds me of something I discovered recently related to evolution: The main story people want us to believe is that 4-6 million years ago, humans didn't exist, and that we had a common ancestor with a chimpanzee. They say that this "wan't a chimp" but that it also "wasn't a human." So that means it would have to have features of both. The problem is, chimpanzees don't have features of both, and humans don't have features of both. If humans and chimps don't have features of both, then how could the common ancestor have features of both? That means either humans evoluved from chimps, or chimps evolved from humans. Obviously since humans are more advanced than chimps, the humans must have "evolved" from chimps. However, if chimps evolted into humans, then how are there still chimps? According to evolution, birds evolved from dinosaurs, therefore there are no dinosaurs left. If humans evolved from chimps, then IT MAKES NOT SENSE FOR THERE TO BE ANY CHIMPS
This has to beg the question, why do so many scientists believe in evolution? Even though many scientists do NOT believe in it, there is still a significant percent that does. If you think about it, the darwinists have the same evidence as us, but we can come to different conclusions because we don't have the bias of darwinism. Darwinism is the biased assumption that Richard Darwin had all the correct ideas about life science, based on the fact that he was a leading scientist of the time (the 19th century). Actually, Darwin wasn't even a real scientist, he just drew pictures and made stuff up on a boat, but the darwinists don't want to hear that. The bias of darwinism makes many people deluded into thinking that the evidence always points in favor of THEIR view, even though to an unbiased person that would not be the case. But the delusional/biased people aren't the only ones that make up believers in evolution. Since evolutionists have a monopoly on the media and on education, they are able to brainwash (for lack of a better word) aspiring students. That is how some people can continue to be deluded. However, science teachers also dismiss any evidence against evolution a priori, and even refuse to discuss it at all. Many students end up thinking that the only evidence out there is evidence IN FAVOR of evolution, and they're just ignorant of the facts that go against the mainstream theory.
this.
op, stop spreading disinformation. your ideas are fine, but you can't just shit out the first thing that comes to your mind as a fact, because it isn't. it's an idea.
I think you need to learn the difference between fresh and raw meat.
Most animals will get after eating raw meat that has been sitting around for a while, even in a refrigerator.
Fresh meat, however, is perfectly fine.
But we can eat raw meat. Ever had a blue steak? Raw meat from the supermarket is different from raw meat from a fresh kill. There's still a risk, and we're not as good at it as, say, a cat, but it's not as big.
I don't think it's bait. I think he's just an idiot.
Because we evolved to cook and use fire
you can eat any raw meat you want
fun fact, you can eat any meat raw as long as it's not venomous or rotten
Explain pokemon. Checkmate.
Holy shit that's so so wrong. Why would it need to have features of both.
>Birds evolved from dinosaurs therefore there are no dinosaurs left
wrong.
We can eat raw meat, you're just a pussy.
but it's unhealthy
maybe if raw meat didn't potentially contain blood pathogens like viruses, bacteria, parasites, or even prions, we could eat it
really makes you think that if you die from disease by eating raw meat, especially since there was no hygiene standard thousands of years ago, you might not 'evolve' eating raw meat
0/10
Your body just has to work harder to get calories from it.
Fresh meat from a healthy animal is perfectly fine.
Because evolution is false
>Your body just has to work harder to get calories from it.
why doesn't it take less, how inefficient!
EVOLUTION BTFO
>Can't eat raw meat
>Not extinct
If evolution is real, why haven't humans evolved to harness the power of the quantum vacuum directly? And why haven't we evolved to instantly teleport?
not if you first say a Hail Mary and turn counter clockwise three times with your eyes closed.
Ha! Evolution saved! Chrisfags BTFO
Who said we didn't? Learn to meditate
We can eat raw meat.
Just not raw ground beef and not for any evolutionary reason.
One can speculate that even to primitive humans cooked meat tasted better. Since fire was so useful, the more successful tribes would always have fire available, and then it turned out that the necessity of tolerating raw meat didn't outweigh the extra complexity for the digestive system which means that it was evolutionary advantageous to handle cooked meat over raw meat.
It's all speculation on my end though, maybe my assumption that there is an inherent cost to being able to handle raw meat is wrong, and it simply fell to the wayside because you're more likely to get a disease from raw meat. After all most humans can handle raw meat to this day.
This is so dumb it pains me. You clearly are ignorant enough not to try at least to understand what the fuck is evolution about, if u say such stupid shit
It's not safe. Unprotected sex is not unhealthy only that is unsafe and IF the other one is somehow infected with anykind of shit, you get sick.
Dude .. gtfo and go learn some biology
Biologically speaking we did not need it. We think we need more, so we come up with stuff. But we did not need that stuff to exist.
Who are you stay we need anything?
If evolution is real, then why do humans still exist?
>If evolution is real, then why do humans still exist?
because we're the best adapted so far, goy