I don't know how else to tell you this:
>Companies like money
>Fraud costs money
>Hiring people that are probably not going to commit fraud is a good thing
You honestly sound like a 15year old.
Scientific fraud
Mason Taylor
Chase Harris
Actually fraud makes you a lot of money in the short run, and by the time your lies get discovered and start costing the company money, you'll be out of there.
That's why fraud is so common -- the short-term benefits far exceed the long-term costs.
It's the same reason why it's hard to care about the environment, why people procrastinate, why extremist politics is becoming popular, why banks become "too big to fail", and why no one's doing anything about the heat death of the universe.
Xavier Johnson
We are talking academic fraud here. And it is common. There is a huge problem of moral hazard here in that the academic institutions benefit from NOT stopping fraud since it contributes to the publication count.
Basically you just have to accept it. However you should somehow keep evidence that you were pressured into this position. And hang on to this evidence until EXTERNAL circumstances forces your hand. Even journals protect the fraud, witness the resistance to take Clare Francis seriously even though she (?) has uncovered massive fraud over the years.
en.wikipedia.org