Category: Unimaginably Large and Small numbers that surpass googolplex or negative googolplex

I might, but I think you're acute. Maybe you want to talk about triple integrals sometime.

Aleph nole

TREE

The first Reinhardt cardinal

From those numbers the only one that exists is the Googol. The Googolplex is obviously beyond 10^200 so please stop masturbating your autism with numbers that can't exist.

The Googol is a nice number though. Really big but low complexity, that's my kind of number right there.

wildberger pls go

You go lol. Show me the Googolplex outside of Expr.

You cant! Because it is not a number, merely an expression.

These ultrafinitists have been the laughingstock of mathematics for YEARS now and yet they're still trying to sound smug. I for one am glad Wilderberger is keeping all of the brainlets out of math. Absolutely hilarious.

Out of math? Lol are you dumb? I'm currently an undergrad in pure mathematics but I let Wildberger give me direction. I'm not the only one in this journey too.

When I finish this journey my dissertation will be about how everyone else is retarded except for me. I will create a theory of rational limits and then a complete theory of rational analysis.

You just wait. Wildberger was able to disprove the goldbach conjecture using big number theory in just like 3 slides. SLIDES. Not even a formal paper was needed to disprove it, Big Number Theory is that fucking powerful.

After I have my theory of rational analysis I don't know what I will disprove first. Maybe the Riemann Hypothesis.

Big Number Theory + Rational Analysis will be able to literally disprove everything. I will be publishing a new paper each day lol.

99999999999999999999999999999999999999999*999999999999999999999999

must be the biggest number ever and i myself made it lol xDD

That is an expression, not a number.

Prove that it evaluates to a number if you want to call it a number, fag.

For example, I know that 2+2 is a number because 2+2 = [II] + [II] = [IIII] = 4

2+2 is mapped to 4.

But what is your bullshit mapped to? Probably nothing. That expression is probably not even a number.

(googolplexianth!)^(graham's number!)

Thank you for proving my point :)

Infinity - 1

The thing that makes ultrafinitists retarded is the same thing that makes SJWs retarded. You both try to redefine words to mean what you want them to mean.

The SJWs like to redefine racism so that it only affects minorities and only whites can be racist. The thing is, we already had a great definition before they came and fucked it up.

Then, they get into arguments about how people are using the term racism wrong. They don't spend their time arguing about real shit. They just enjoy the definition-jerking, which doesn't take real thought.

You're no better. You're trying to redefine what a 'number' is to other people to fit your model. And then you attack people when they don't use the word in the same way as you.

But him using the term differently doesn't affect you. He's using it the way it is supposed to be used. If you want a different term, don't redefine 'number', just make up your own goddamn term. Then you can stop arguing about retarded shit like definitions, and actually making a case for your model.

Can't wait to read your papers on viXrA, btw.

The history of mathematics is the history of redefining numbers.

When Cantor's genius saw the sun's light he was also attacked. No one believed his tighter and rigorous definition of number would serve any purpose.

Now we use his set theory and his definition of number.

Then Wildberger came with an ever tighter and more rigorous definition of number and as happens, those too dumb to understand him attack him but history always takes the same course. In a couple of decades we will have mset theory as the standard foundation and big number theory as the new number theory.

I bet people like you still wish geometry was the foundation for math lol. Too dumb to understand a little abstraction now? lol.

I have no idea about math and now I am wondering which one of you is right

You tell me who is wrong.

I mean to me the whole concept of infinity does sound weird.. it really seems so uncomplete and philosophical compared to other math. But well I am no mathematician so what do I know

>people initially disagreed a right idea so anyone disagreeing with me now is wrong

no. ultrafinitists are ridiculous. you can't do much of modern math without choice, much less without infinity

it's not "incomplete" in any way. the axiom of infinity is accepted by everyone

>Too dumb to understand a little abstraction now?

Abstraction is the opposite of what's happening. He's advocating that there are *fewer* numbers and basing his ideas on natural phenomena.

Or are you redefining the word 'abstract' as well?

I will now provide this thread with the biggest number.
Let x be the largest number in all posts (excluding this one).
Then y = x + 1 is the biggest number in this thread.

All numbers outside Z are trivially dark numbers, so I don't see the point of this thread.

10000000000^100000000^googolplexianth^101866666666666666666666666682828282828282

Z= Y*X^100 *googol

\omega_1^\mathrm{CK}

fixed

Yeah, but at least the man had proofs. Ultrafinitists' only argument is

>muh feels

i = graham_number();
while(time < max_age_of_universe) {
i = i^i;
}

print i; // ignore that the universe has ceased existing at this pint

forgot to add_ /thread

>
(Grahams number!) ^ (Graham's number!)

I once had as a homework to calculate the number of microstates of a solar mass black hole. That was a pretty large number.

aleph_aleph_aleph_aleph_aleph_....

(Grahams number!) ^ (Graham's number!) + 1

>implying aleph is a number
undergrads everyone

largest number = my BBC

Not the biggest, but I really like Belphegor's prime.

1000000000000066600000000000001

It's null bitch.

> cardinal numbers aren't number
:^)

GET DOWN

What number is smaller?

-googol or 1/googol?

that's right

Well in terms of magnitude the second one

>[math]10^{100} = 10^{10^{10}}[/math]
What is wrong with you??

>what number is smaller, a fukiin huge negative number, or about zero?

Graham's number + 1 is not a useful number, graham's number is the largest number that appears in a mathematical proof. (or theorem or whatever i don't know.)

Why does it have to be useful

Here's a mathematical proof that involves Graham's number + 1,

Prove that Graham's number < Graham's number+1:

0

googology.wikia.com/wiki/Googology_Wiki
Forcal, Meameamealokkapoowa oompa

> Meameamealokkapoowa oompa

I know about this, incredible number!

elaborate!

grahams number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Then you should remain silent

Hey
you can't
just
like
do that

...

Let [math] a = Googolplexianth [/math] Now let [math] b be an integer such that b > a [/math] Done and done. Next.

>these numbers names
This is goshomity levels of cringe.

show me the Expr outside of wildburger's videos. Also show me that a number (of element of Expr, if you wish) is not an actual number if we can't easily give it's decimal representation
for like 150 years

YFW math is actually just people making shit up

>ITT I am euphoric

It's (10^10)^10=10^100

then it should have been notated like that in the OP

ur mums circumference

You think I wrote the meme? It's a random image I used to illustrate large numbers, stupid cocksucker! Fuck you and your family!

3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!