>>8522045

How long before crappy /pol/r9k/-bait stops being posted on Veeky Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/your-money-does-cheating-_n_2323208.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

when scientific american stops publishing it?

Just because they are biological, doesn't make them right, nor logical nor necessarily healthy.

This, I'm sorry OP but you have a tendentious way of interpreting the article, stop being a moron and trying to use science to justify your sexism.

>facts are biology are wrong because....?

Biologically, woman have an incentive to marry a rich beta husband and than cuck him and have Chad's babies.

Given our modern society and legal framework, they will be protected and their children will be the best this way.

Does that make it right? Do you want to be cucked?

in non complete feminist shitholes the male could divorce her if he finds her children aren't his.

>but in sweden

>trash pop-sci 'zine belongs on Veeky Forums
Go away

Yes and she will still get alimony to raise Chad's children.

Look just admit you were wrong and stfu.

I've never seen a male being forced to pay alymony for children that aren't his.

at least not in civilized countries.

Well then you don't know how alimony works.

In any case that's besides the point that a biological instinct is not necessarily moral or healthy.

Child support[edit]
Alimony is not child support, where, after divorce, one parent is required to contribute to the support of their children by paying money to the child's other parent or guardian. Child support is considered a payment that a parent is making for the support of their offspring, and the parent who pays it pays the taxes.[21] However, alimony is treated as taxable income, in most countries, to the receiving spouse, and, in most cases, deducted from the gross income of the paying spouse (the United States IRS does not allow for child support to be deducted from AGI).

Yeah whatever, he is right though, write being a bitch about it

huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/your-money-does-cheating-_n_2323208.html

if the women cheats, then she is the one who has to pay alimony.

male alimony also exist retard.

Are you a moron? So you gonna keep this endless discussion about semantics because you can't deal with the fact that science does not support your sexist behaviour? Go on then, my autistic friend.

I'll give you these examples:
IQ, male median is bigger, also the range is wider for males, meaning there's more males with IQ enough to being geniuses.
Sport female records are comparable to male teenagers.
Not a comparable or remarkable important leader in history, sure there's exceptions like Cleopatra but not example of a women born in a poor condition and making an empire.

There's a reason we have gender dysmorphia.

Also, look and compare the artistic output of both sexes, males have several or hundreds geniuses and their output can't be reached even by the best female counterpart.

No female equivalent of cervantes, bach, mozart, beethoven, shakespeare.
No important female philosopher in history beyond some feminists thinkers in the XX century.

Even the religious argument in judeocristian traditions make God male and Jesus also a male, the women is regarded as a second though made of male flesh.
Even in non christians traditions, the female is regarded as a passive agent.

Also, not many examples of females entrepeneurships, most females that are rich are because of family conection, meanwhile males even from poorest backgrounds have reached the higher positions.

Compare simply the sport competitions between the WC female winners in soccer versus average teenager male teams, they simply get destroyed.

Also, most males tend to gravitate towards STEM, arts, politics, economics and other highly influencial cultural institutions, meanwhile females tend to gravitate towards nursing, teaching, psychology and journalism, that are low cultural impact degrees.

Many more other arguments.

It's not because of lack of resources, as black males have archieved more in history than white females.

The biggest intelectuals and philosophers have been mysogynistic, look at schopenhauer opinion on females.

What is your point really?

women are inferior.

Cringed. Go back to fucking Reddit.

Meant /r9k/

Either a roastie toastie or a beta white knight that thinks defending women will get him laid

Prove him wrong or stfu

I take it you have not been to Europe.

>There's a reason we have gender dysmorphia.
>dysmorphia
Typo? Or dimorphism?

>he doesn't understand the "is/ought" concept

I'm a taco.

I'm not from a soon thirld world sharia region.

>can't refute the facts
>let's use philosophy
cuck.

I agree that women are less capable of doing anything worthwhile to the world but how does that equate to them being inferior? Women can:
1. Stay at home to take care of the children.
2. Cook and clean.
3. Make good therapists and teachers (that isn't math or sciences except biology or psychology)
4. Can make a good loving relationship

>can't refute the facts
Why would I want to refute the facts? I've always believed women were inferior and I'm right.

Doesn't mean we should hate them or treat them like shit or rub their inferiority in their face. Animals are inferior but I don't torture them for fun.

sorry then if I misstook your position.