I believe earth and other PLANE(t)S are 3D representations of 4+D objects.
They are flat when you are on them and when you're looking at them from a significant distance they appear round and to rotate because that's the only way we can comprehend a plane "scrolling" through 3dimensions from the 4th.
Pic related, but a "sphere" instead
Oliver Long
>Flat earth isn't wrong but globe earth isn't right I can see this
Cooper Scott
>tfw to intelligent for more than 2 dimensions
Liam Sanchez
This makes more sense than I'm willing to admit right now
Isaac Davis
Yep, for sure only planets... There is field in wich waves forms waves in another fields, ouch nooo, my world is doomed.
Oliver Russell
>Yep, for sure only planets Please enlighten me.
Is everything 4+D?
Are we just a 3dimensional projection of a 4+D dataset?
Jeremiah Perez
Its actually more than just plain tesserect, as those things collide even hard things like protons appear out of nowhere but they are very unstable... It's noisy.
Ryan Collins
Honestly, this isn't interesting. Any interest in optics?
Bentley Ramirez
I just used the tessaract as an example because I can't possibly fathom what a 4dimensional sphere would look like
Lucas Myers
4D array of property instead 3D array of property?