Fuck Chomsky

Fuck Chomsky

If you think this guy is anything special youre a pseudo intellectual kike and should go back to rebbit

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=f3IUU59B6lw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

no basically rebbit would be initiating every and any discussion about this guy at all

sorry son, imma salvia this officialis

Name one (1) argument he has you disagree with, providing empirical (factual) backing for your claim

You should tell that to chomsky. Al he did as a linguist was the same thing every social scientist does for a living: throw ambiguous and interchangeable terminology at the nature/nurture line and capture the wishful thinking of those who already wanted to think that because it matches their philosophical/theological predisposition. His heart is in a good place, but he climbed up his own ass a few decades ago and lost track of anything that wasn't his own shit.

Why do people bring the jews into everything? They aren't the ones doing it. I swear.

He isn't the greatest linguist who ever lived. He is however a very thoughtful intellectual even when wrong.

Do you normally get this upset when people have a different opinion than you?

Because they have no imagination and just default to the same boogeyman fags like them have been going on about for a few thousand years now.

Indeed.
/thread

So you're full of shit. Alright then

What's the alternative? The fact that he managed to take a fat shit on behaviorism while coming up with a uniquely influential theory of language acquisition makes his linguistic work worthwhile enough.

>Uniquely influential
>Gnostic regurgitation that can't be proven.

Pick one.

Good job dipshit.

Anyone can take a fat shit on behaviorism. Behaviorism is a fat shit.

maybe. but at the time it was the working philosophy under which all psychologists operated. The fact that Chomsky's arguments against it in Syntactic Structures actually forced Skinner to concede the point is pretty impressive

>unique theory of language acquisition
>"meme magic did it babbys have sense for meme magic"

fucking idiot. a quick glance at his wikipedia page is probably enough to learn about his plethora of original contributions to the field of linguistics. Sincerely, a Stanford Linguistics post-doc

babies : ability to develop language : : you : ability to hide (badly) idiocy behind sarcastic autism

They both innate, faggot

>babies : ability to develop language : : you : ability to hide (badly) idiocy behind sarcastic autism
sorry, I'm not two years old so I can't really tell how these two connect together

DFW absolutely raped this oratory posture for all its usefulness, too. Good for him, fooled a lot of plebs.

Academia is a viper's nest of bullshit artists. Anyone who has anything to do with art should shun these greasy fuckheads. Having an MFA is a wonderful indicator that a novel is going to suck shit.

>Wikipedia

>Stanford post doc.

No. More like you are the fucking idiot kiddo.

I do this in uni all the time and it works perfectly
tutors think I'm a lazy genius

OP got roasted by the facts in the last thread and now he is buttmad
Try to refute this OP, I dare you: youtube.com/watch?v=f3IUU59B6lw

Chomsky is good and worth reading at his area of expertise: linguistics.
His thoughts about economy and policits can be safely ignored.

>EXPOSED BY ME
>RELEVANT
>RATIONAL

>kiddo
this was actually a covert compliment on his superior language acquisition capabilities

Obviously Chomsky is an autistic hack loved only by the same kinds of people that love Vonnegut.

Harris was exposed as a boob
He was unable to comprehend what Chomsky was talking about
And tried to change the discussion from the facts to an imagined what if scenario he had concocted that obviously supports his argument
And what is his argument?
His contribution to intellectual discussion?
>If you mean to do good, then unfortunate consequences don't matter

>accusing someone of autism
this isn't /tv/

however, his ability to read by staring at a whole page for a second and his instant recall of facts and figures does suggest some slightly different neural development