No /sqt/ thread detected.
how the FUCK did he get to trace?
No /sqt/ thread detected.
how the FUCK did he get to trace?
If I'm doing an exam in quantum mechanics, will the answers to previous problems change when I answer the final problem?
Depends on whether you check your work or not.
[math]w_k^TS_tw_k = tr(w_k^TS_tw_k) = tr(w_kw_k^TS_t)[/math]
then bring the sum back into the trace and define [math]WW^T = \sum_{k=1}^d w_kw_k^T[/math]
Yeah I'm dumb I didn't realise [math]W^T_kS_tw_k[/math] leads to trace. thanks user
Anyone knows how the second term came to be? If I open the brackets, yeah I get [math]X^TX[/math], but how did they get to [math]W^TXX^TW[/math]?
How do I revise lads. Got my notes I made, the teachers notes, practice questions in front of me atm I'm reading my and their notes and ever so often spewing it back to myself feels passive AF.
(x^(1/2) - 4)/(x - 16)
This problem looks so simple but I have no idea how to simplify this expression. Help?
Wolfram can't figure out this shit.
{1, 30, -2, 71, 1, 1, -132, 490, 23}
Could you using interpolation?
My retardation precedes me.
Don't you think that root(x)-4 and x -16 look awfully similar?
The solution is (1/(root(x)+4))