Sugar is the normie term for carbohydrates. Their is nothing wrong with consuming excessive sugar if you eat your micronutrient requirements and if you do NOT gain weight (assuming you don't need or arent trying to gain weight).
That's why complex carbohydrates are recommended over "sugar" despite the fact that they are metabolized basically the same way, the complex just require a bit of hydrolysis first before consumption. As for weight loss, that solely depends on calories in vs. calories out. Sugary drinks are not satieiting foods, and thus make it easy to overconsume calories.
But to answer your question, no sugar is not bad if you stay normal weight + consume proper micronutrients. Sugar is actually one of the 2 energy sources required for humans.
>tl;dr no sugar is not bad if you take your vitamins and become a fatass
Kayden James
>You're not able to smell yourself. You guys smell gross, like hobo alcoholics Your mum's cunt smells like that. >Not everyone eating a ketogenic low-carb diet ever experience this ketone breath – and for most people who do it’s a temporary thing that goes away after a week or two. dietdoctor.com/low-carb/side-effects Not fat. Experienced that once or twice after heavy workout last year.
Liam Mitchell
Fructose is supposedly the worst sugar to consume. I question the validity of thay claim, but you should certainly stay away from juices. Because juices are not satiating
William Bennett
oats is a cooked cereal you retard
Carter Robinson
go away
Nathan Anderson
Fat or sugar are interchangeable you tard, at least one of them is essential faggot
Hunter Thomas
Go back to your food *sciences* major, retard.
Dominic Sanchez
>Sugar [is] an essential nutrient >Fat or sugar are interchangeable you tard, [at least one of them is] essential faggot That's what sugar did to you, make you a retard?
Nolan Davis
You're both thinking of fructose. Fructose gets stuck in the liver and over time can cause insulin resistance.
HFCS breaks down into fructose + glucose, just like sucrose (you can think of HFCS as a cheaper version of sucrose).
HFCS is not as bad as fructose, though people don't typically get pure fructose unless they got scammed by naturists into drinking fruit juice.
