Are you smarter than a Nip?

>precision on the numbers

That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.
So it should be 9.3 +/- 0.3

its ten you fucking retards, round the decimals 6+ 4 ya goofs

Do any Japs here know the answer?

-1.0/12

32

I know what you did there

3*9 + 5*1

computer science
physicist
economist
philosopher
woman studies

drop out

>not using dot for multiplication and comma for decimals

mathematician

3.9 + 5.1 = there is an unique solution and it's trivial

Depends. In what group are we and what do the symbols '3.1' and '5.9' mean in terms of the elements of that group? Also, what is the explicit definition of the operation '+' for this group?

a white man spitting on a black man

>32
philosopher
>32
woman studies

K E K

Even if they did theres only 1% chance they will be right.

>further proof will be left as an excercise for the reader

/thread

memelord

9.00000000001

Why you shouldn't build a reactor on the japanese coastline.

>That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.

found the ''grades arent important Im wise in a way that cannot be measured'' guy

That's not how that works

obviously the answer is ???

3.9 + 5.1 = ??? = 3?
? = (3.9 + 5.1)/3 = 3

>??? = 3?
>not ?^3
shigeridoo

>Are you smarter than a Nip?
Nein

Who the fuck cares lol
Only nerds work with numbers and care about precision in their crunching

As we lack definitions for any of the symbols/groups of symbols in the picture, particularly the three question marks, we cannot deduce anything.

q.e.d.

>99% of jap school children are not autists
Pretty reassuring, actchually.

Hard to believe unless schoolchildren is defined as being quite young.

easy

just consider 3.9 as 4-0.0999... and 5.1 as 5.0999....

and then triple integrate

9.0+/-0.1 you fucking brainlet

8.1

? = 3

Q.E.D

3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
3? = 9
? = 3

3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
?^3 = 9
? = 2.08

8

It's 9, japanese children are just complete idiots, that's why there are only 1 % who are right.

lel

this guy fucks

9.0 implies [math]\pm[/math] 0.05.

8

quality post, kekked out loud

? = 3

dats it mang

3.9十5.1
(3.9)(十)(5.1)
十 is japanese for 10
(3.9)(10)(5.1)

193.9 is the correct answer

it's 11

t. asian chemist

10.
t. Engineer

>philosopher
>woman studies

got a laugh out of me

it's 9 considering the precision is implied to be two significant figures if there are no zeroes ahead of them.

>
checked and keked

There are quantum digits after the first decimal points you just can't see them like in real life

reverse image search gives me nothing, sauce?

3.9 + 5.1 = 8.10

Assuming the equality sign is a test for equality (e.g. in Pascal)

> 3.5 + 5.1 = ???
Compilation error. Symbol ??? not found.

3.5 => 3.9

109.1 including dark numerals and dark operands.

my calculator it says 9 so...

What the fuck is going on, is Veeky Forums just pretending to be retarded?
9.0 +/- 0.1

Ive got $5.1
Ive got $3.9
How much do i have all together?
Fuck if i know because you dont show the full amount, ya cunt
9.000000000018284827e738wi4747