Why is it so taboo to even imply that one race is smarter than another? I mean they'll say that 60...

Oh, and no, I'm talking about extremes, not averages.

>Also it's important to remember that the 'research' on controversial sociological issues such as race, gender, or porn is almost always of very poor quality.
Reminds me of how a sociology textbook I was flipping through said lesbian parents were better at raising kids because gender stereotypes were lower according to this one research in a small canadian town.

But there's not, especially when talking about intelligence. Both the white and asian averages are higher than the black averages. There's going to be more difference between a random white person and a random black person than two random white people or two random black people

It's not taboo if you tell the truth and not involve politics.

When you say Asians are smarter than whites what you are referring to is AVERAGE IQ scores as well as other similar metrics - this doesn't mean you are allowed to not judge white people on individual basis - far more reliable than probabilistically inferring who's who - then we'd just have Asians.

These averages shouldn't necessarily affect policy - we are already trying to build a society where the smartest people (read the guys with the best alleles if you think that) end up filtered away from the rest and succeeding, at least that's the idea.

It literally has 0 implications.

There's going to be an enormous difference between a high class and a low class white person. Same for a black person. It's okay to not like sociology but there's no point in just straight up denying the fact that social position greatly influences your intelligence. That's the whole thing about the "IQ spectrum". If you were sent to a third world country just after being born I guarantee your IQ would be more than 20 points lower than now.

>But there's not,
There's not what?
More variation between individuals than races?

>There's going to be more difference between a random white person and a random black person than two random white people or two random black people
This doesn't disprove my statement.
The bell curves overlap quite a bit.
The dumbest white man is dumber than the smartest black man.
Also: does it bother you not to use words like "shitskin" when you post outside /pol/?

>ITT: i feel like my race is smarter than other races and people should acknowledge that to make me feel better even tho there's no proof my emotions are valid as facts

LOL you are completely ignorant of history, aren't you?

"smart" refers to an individual

>The dumbest white man is dumber than the smartest black man.

Again, we're talking about averages. You keep going off on tangents about either end of the curve