He is the best presocratic philosopher, isn't he?
Heraclitus
No
But that's wrong
But that's right
Yes.
No it's not you dumb fuck
>presocratic philosopher
>DUDE WHAT IF EVERYTHING IS MADE OF X LMAO
Thats not what he says a monistic materialist reading of his work is stupid
He's bullshit. I've stepped into many different rivers multiple times each
Mopey little bitch
>billions of years BC
>▶
he would agree with you:)))))
i dont get his what-is and what-is-not. is he just saying everything that exists is what-is with some extra bullshit on top and what-is-not isnt even worth discussing or what.
When you unite the two you reach the ultimate.
Yeah it's jus tlike uniting Platonism and Aristotelianism, Rationalism and Empiricism, Continental and Analytic, etdc.
He was the best philosopher, period. It's a shame his book didn't survive because reportedly even Socrates was too much of a pleb to understand it.
>multiple times each
no he wouldnt
This.
To paraphrase
>What I do understand is brilliant, and I assume what I don't understand is equally brilliant
Exactly, familiaris.
he is indeed the best and wisest.
>If every man had exactly what he wanted, he would be no better than he is now.
p profound. It seems like he set the basic formula for all modern novels.
>the obscure one
The first continental.