While ebooks are cheaper, I feel like I learn better with physical books.
The feeling of flipping the pages, touching the paper, highlighting sentences and bookmarking, it greatly enhances the experience and it's objectively the superior way to retain information, rather than staring at a bright screen without any elegance or class.
only real argument physical books have is personal preference.
so shut the fuck up.
For backing stuff up and changing font size, ebooks are the best. Books can be used anywhere by anyone without any power required. You can drop a book and it will be okay. You can print out your own copies from ebooks without trouble.
>highlighting sentences
KYS
>I keep a library of pdfs in my iphone
>Carry a variety of mathematics in it
>Whenever I go out and get bored like when waiting in a hospital or when I go too early to uni and have to wait I can simply start casually reading
>It is that easy
Bookfags can't do this. Either read at home or go to a faggot library. Top kek get real m8.
...
/thread
It's all about personal taste.
>the superior way to retain information
YOU RETAIN INFORMATION BY DOING THE EXERCISES YOU LAZY FUCK
I find it much easier to flip through the book quickly and reference information in multiple locations with a physical copy, so I got for paper for textbooks. For pleasure reading ebook all the way
Brainlet.
Physical books are better for retaining info, this is fact.
>I skim famous books doing no exercises and talk nonsense in popsci threads pretending I know anything