Category Theory

Sometimes I wonder why people with so much knowledge of upper level mathematics get on Veeky Forums?

Maclane is still the best source for basic category theory. Some of the layer chapters should be supplemented with other material. The best way to learn category is to use it in other areas, I only really became comfortable with the basic machinery years after I became fluent in it, while picking up some simplicial homotopy theory. Homotopy theory in general is a good place to find examples of category theory. For example, coends play a crucial (sometimes left implicit) role in setting up smash products of spectra, or in "calculating" kan extensions, for instance in singularization/realization contexts.

most of us grew up here

i've been here from age 13 to now doing graduate studies in math

you never really leave

>you never really leave
Save for you know the original bunch of tards that hang around here with us. Sites gone from a treehouse for retards with a specific sense of humour to a catch-all shithole.

How depressing :/

hung*

Are you the dude I replied to?

>Are you the dude I replied to?
no

>there is no foundations of math in pure category theory.
of course there is, for example
ncatlab.org/nlab/show/fully formal ETCS
to name one.
Of course, just as people don't really need set theory for decades, nobody is really interested in those alternatives.

ETCS doesn't depend on category theory, people just express it in categorical language because it makes them happier.