And that's going to be our downfall
Why is the racial intelligence divide so taboo?
Dominic Reed
Liam Howard
bbc.com
Wow dude people all over the world eat rats for a variety of reasons. Also the political issues in Zimbabwe aren't quite as simple as "lmao stupid blacks," perhaps of you knew a bit of you'd have an idea
Yeah, many times. A lot of my buddies in college and law school were black and they were quite successful. The dean of my school and several professors were black. And I've worked with black clients on a number of occasions
Have YOU ever been arounf blacks?
Robert Myers
They lived solely on rats and made it clear they were living like animals.
I live around the densest black population in the US. They're closer to animals than humans.
Kevin Bennett
Please read the entire text on this link. It has studies made based on average black and white iq distribuition comaprisons as well as corrections for socio-economical status. It was made by an university, so it has a degree of credibility. This is the proof you are looking for.
sites.biology.duke.edu
Carter Parker
IQ is hereditary.
Aiden Howard
Yeah, and as i said that has little to do with race or whites being better than blacks, and a lot to do with the political and economic situation of postcolonial africa. You can simplify that as "whites left and things went to shit" but thats like saying that rome left and things went to shit in Europe, therefore celts gauls iberians and romano-britons were subhuman scum.
Henry Ortiz
or like whites left Singapore, Hong Kong, and Macau and everything went to shi- oh wait, these are the most developed parts of Asia
Eli Myers
So where was their progress before colonialism?
Ayden Kelly
easy peasy lemon squeezy
en.wikipedia.org
Liam Lewis
Thanks for this, friend. I especially like this part of it:
>Implication with respect to IQ: There is no good reason to believe that racial differences in mean IQ score are caused by underlying racial differences in intelligence.
>General Conclusion: Anyone versed in these simple principles of evolutionary genetics could have recognized the invalidity of Jensen's and Herrnstein and Murray's logic.
of course I am not a geneticist by training so a bit of it was a little over my head and I don't have the ability to critique the methods, but I could follow the logic and it seemed sound