Wow

>this post

>write some shitty kid books
>make gorillions
>these shitty books will generate you and your children and their children gorillions forever
>AYYY TIME TO ACT SAINTLY DEM SOCIAL BROWNIES

Hey is this the ideology thread?

Without charity they would either just die or end up destroying the whole system, all what charity does is perpetuate what already is. You will never end starvation by just giving somebody food and feeling smug about it.

Yeah we should just skip directly to the smugness.

What a white libertarian piece of shit thing to say.

theres a lot of ideology itt
we need some despooking

yeah, it's called being right

It's a socialist principle, faggot.

Go back to /b/ or Xbox Live or wherever it is you ancap children dwell.

IS she the most insufferable cunt in literature?

Do some of you unironically think like this.
>it's better to let suffering continue because if we try to help even one bit, they'll go back to suffering
Ffs they're already suffering to begin with so why is it wrong to help even a little? What are you Marxists'?

How is that even remotely libertarian you illiterate weasel

His point is that charity is not a solution to suffering or poverty wealth distribution is. So JK shouldn't be giving her money to whatever charities she personally feels like to keep poor people at a base level of subsistence. It should nearly all be taken from her and properly rationed out so that no one would need charity in the first place.

>The majority of people spoil their lives by an unhealthy and exaggerated altruism – are forced, indeed, so to spoil them. They find themselves surrounded by hideous poverty, by hideous ugliness, by hideous starvation. It is inevitable that they should be strongly moved by all this. The emotions of man are stirred more quickly than man’s intelligence; and, as I pointed out some time ago in an article on the function of criticism, it is much more easy to have sympathy with suffering than it is to have sympathy with thought. Accordingly, with admirable, though misdirected intentions, they very seriously and very sentimentally set themselves to the task of remedying the evils that they see. But their remedies do not cure the disease: they merely prolong it. Indeed, their remedies are part of the disease.

>They try to solve the problem of poverty, for instance, by keeping the poor alive; or, in the case of a very advanced school, by amusing the poor.

>But this is not a solution: it is an aggravation of the difficulty. The proper aim is to try and reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty will be impossible. And the altruistic virtues have really prevented the carrying out of this aim. Just as the worst slave-owners were those who were kind to their slaves, and so prevented the horror of the system being realised by those who suffered from it, and understood by those who contemplated it, so, in the present state of things in England, the people who do most harm are the people who try to do most good; and at last we have had the spectacle of men who have really studied the problem and know the life – educated men who live in the East End – coming forward and imploring the community to restrain its altruistic impulses of charity, benevolence, and the like. They do so on the ground that such charity degrades and demoralises. They are perfectly right. Charity creates a multitude of sins.

- Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man Under Socialism

not an argument

Fuck off Molyneux.

He said the content of a post was libertarian.

I said it was not and provided evidence to confirm my claim.

Hence: an argument.

Let me know if you'd like me to use smaller words in the future.

Please go back to your containment board.

Rich people give to charity all the time, usually to evade taxes or to schmooze with other rich people for status boosts by going to regular events and galas and dinners so they can all be seen there.

For the longest time I thought they just did it out of cynicism but it turns out they actually think they're saintly liberal guardians of the downtrodden because they use a small fraction of their income, hell, a small fraction of their luxury spending, a small fraction of the money they sign over to family member's names (also to evade taxes), to evade taxes.

Rich people should be gassed.

All of you Marxist "intellectuals" need to learn more about your putrid ideology.
Marxism was created by Zionist Jews who shoved this idea of a utopian state down the throats of the people in order to further their agenda & thus make it easier to introduce an all powerful , one world government which will be lead by their ''Messiah", which any intelligent man of Christian faith knows that that man that the Jews await is in fact the antichrist.
> A state, is called the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly lieth it also; and this lie creepeth from its mouth: "I, the state, am the people."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Irrelevant.

If she thinks giving to charity makes her happy, then so be it. She is simply giving away money she does not feel she's earned and needs. There is no one who can tell her how she should waste away the money she's earned but herself.

More like perpetuating human dependency which causes suffering.

Veeky Forums has really gone to shit.

Marx was raised a Christian and catches flak today among SJW academics for making anti-Semitic remarks in his personal correspondences

Thanks for knowing literally nothing. Btw Nietzsche compliments Jews throughout his works and consistently argues they're way smarter than Germans.

Not an argument. Now leave, the men are talking.

Marx was allegedly a Christian, sure. But he has Jewish roots and had deep respect for the Rothschilds, which is strange considering he was against the bourgeois.
Also care to cite where exactly Marx makes anti-Semitic statements?

>Morally good

Why didn't you just say that's a moral thing to do?

>given far more than you need
>new Potter film, books, attractions, reprints, wands, costumes

What have you done for charity, friend?

Just out of curiosity, why is she getting acclaim for doing this?

Most other super successful authors do the same. King has been giving away about 90% of his income since the 90s, for one.

I donate £5 per month to:

edgeofexistence.org/

I dont brag about it. Youre the third person I've actually told in the months I've been doing it.

lol

Define [by her donations] "charity."

I'll decide what I think of her then, and not a moment sooner.

Why did she not invest the money, so that 30 years later she could give a far greater sum to charitable causes?

Thank you. American here and this is the one hard geopolitical opinion I have. Politics and real world issues are a giant freakshow to me. I see no point in debating new policy when the western world has enough billionaires to feed, clothe, and educate the world and still walk away disgustingly rich. You and your kids and their kids can retire on ten million. If you're sitting on billions it's your responsibility to give back.

idk man
why didn't she just use it to buy out the UK media and propagandise for the labour party 24/7 so comrade corbyn gets elected who could do a lot more for the poor than charity?

Libertarians are the biggest proponents of charity. Charity is their answer to everything. Charity is inherently reactionary and creates noting but poverty.
Why didn't Jesus invest one penny for mankind? At 5% compound interest it would have increased to a greater sum of monetary wealth than containable in 150 million planets the size of Earth made of solid gold! We'd all be rich!

Thanks man, that pic literally blinded me.

10/10

BASED

Doesn't that exempt her from paying tax?

I suck homeless dicks for free

What's your point, OP? That a mediocre writer can't be a good person?

Post your favourite charities.

inb4 my patreon desu

question that doesnt deserve it's own thread so I'll ask it in this cancerous one: I'm working on a story right now, is a kid (2-5 yrs old) drowning in a pool a cliche?

You could Google it if you really wanted. I notice you don't cite anything to do with the Rothschilds (your kind never does).

I don't think of anti-Semitism as an endorsement of someone's philosophical work. You have no business on this board. Stay on /pol/ where an opinion requires no background in anything. You're pathetic.

Don't worry about cliches, and being "original". Just write your story and post it here.

thanks, I needed that. will do

>a kid (2-5 yrs old) drowning in a pool a cliche?
is that your story?

My source is pic-related, delve deeper into it if you can handle, but your kind always turns the blind eye. There's my source, where's yours?
Also, why so much sentiment, friend? Are we not having a civilized discussion as men? Are you unable to, or are you perhaps a Jew yourself which is why you got offended easily?
> You're pathetic.
Great contribution to this discussion, but if anyone is pathetic it is you for turning to offenses instead of using your intellect.
Also, I don't browse /pol/ so nice try, what I do instead, is something called research. Give it a try sometime, pal .

I don't see anything wrong with what Rowling did, and every continentalfag in this thread is only confirming why their "branch" of "philosophy" is the laughingstock of higher order thought.

>research
>/pol/.jpg
>phoneposting

OY VEY HE FOUND ABOUT US SHUT IT DOWN

>image.jpg

For a guy with no sources, you are really smug and passive agressive

Nice arguments.
Are (you) samefags retarded? I clearly stated that one could look into it if one chooses to. I'm not going to hold anyone's hand through the process. Go on google and do your own research instead of asking someone to spoon-feed it to you.

>loses "billionaire" status
>in order to buy metric fucktons of other status

I used to like her books. I really, really did, you have no idea. Like, autism obsessed levels. I passed through it quite naturally while retaining a fondness as for something which brought much joy, as did Legend of Zelda and, later, as my tastes grew, theology. But goddamn does JK Rowling ever keep sticking her dick into Harry Potter, and won't leave it the fuck alone. She's worse than George Lucas. It's really fucked up how much this was actually a creation of the fanbase itself, who interacted with her to shit and completely broke down the separation of the story from the author. By the time of the "Dumbledore is gay" comment (which wouldn't have bothered me so much even if there had at least been some intertextual evidence - which there was none), I gave up trying to like Harry Potter.

She completely took that fantasy world I could so easily get caught up in. Now that is gone. JK Rowling ruined Harry Potter.

Tbh what else is she really in a position to do with such an insane amount of money, she is ultimately just a very normal woman.

Harry Potter was always shit and you're a girl if you ever thought otherwise so post your feet and get out.

that shit is tight af yo

I actually believe that. It's lame to rub it in everyone's faces, though.

to clarify I mean the picture, not what wrote

Have you uh, read Marx? I think it would prove to be more valuable than charts with random uncited facts?

So prove me wrong then since you're so well-read on Marx. Go ahead, dismantle my statements.

What? youre not making any fucking sense. how does charity as a whole perpetuate "what already is"? Im fucking walking away from this damn computer and when I get back you better not be here you little bitch I's kill youse.

>Charity reactionary

Lol

As an affluent jew myself who often dines in nice resturants and is a product of an educational system funded by rich jews I can tell you that the JIDF, the Zionists, any and all of these hairbrained organizations you claim to be out there in the world, manipulating the economy and politics for their own personal gain, these organizations simply do not exist. My families wealth comes from a long line of hard work, that only allowed itself to flourish into a highly above average income when they emmigrated to America. You, born in the south (probably) had a hardworking great grandfather, who told his son that he didn't need to graduate high-school to make a living, and then that man told his son he didn't need to attend college, leading to you, the first educated man in your line. And you decided, with your hick values still deeply imbued, to take up literature as your hobby. And you, whose education might lead to a long line of affluent, well educated men and women who are just as well off as my family is now, will still preach about anti-semitism online because your father told you those kikes must have an edge in the world somehow, and he was right, but now you have that same edge. So don't come on here yelling about how jews controlled this or jews manipulated that, and instead focus on how you can improve yourself to a level in society when you'll realize that none of these things you once believed were ever true.

ROAST

This is not how a discussion about literature is supposed to work...

I haven't read much but check out The German Ideology at one point in his discussion on the division of labor he mentions "the separation of production and commerce, the formation of a special class of merchants; a separation which, in the towns bequeathed by a former period, had been handed (among other things with the Jews)" I don't really read Marx as an anti-semite but he sometimes makes the play of associating Jews with elements of capitalism and it's not hard to read between those lines.

We should end starvation by allowing people to die as they naturally would in the most dignified manner possible instead of giving them vaccines and providing for them so that they can lead a miserable hollow existence while destroying the earth.

Pure Ideology

no, it's part of it though. backstory

Westerners use more resources and just leech and judge everything. Whites are despicable creatures

This completely uncited image.jpg doesn't even demonstrate that Marx had "deep respect for the Rothschilds" lmao

The guy literally advocated for their deaths do you know anything about Marxism???

Unless you have proof of Marx's "respect" consider yourself completely BTFO

Now pick your jimmies up off the floor and head on back to /pol/. Go on, get!

I don't disagree.

Working to displace primitive peoples and to help them westernize is certainly not something we should be doing regardless.

Not an argument

Agree

Never heard something like that. Also, promises don't make original a story, develop of the stories are the ones who do it

>literally advocated for their deaths
Care to cite where you got the evidence? And like I said earlier, I'm not going to do the research for you, are you that incompetent that you can't do a quick Google search or do you need someone to hold your hand through the process? Communism is great for bankers since they loan money to the all powerful state & considering that Marx was a Free Mason of Jewish background, he was definitely in the Zionist scheme. It's you leftists that are going to be the death of humanity with all your degenerate views.

LMAO at all these people talking about preferences and group values like they're real solid objects/intrinsically a part of reality.
People are literally animals and morality is just a fancy word for 'doing what's best for the health and prosperity of your community'.
Pseudo-spiritual fucking morons I bet you're all paying for a degree in naval gazing delusion too.

Found the woman

pure ideology

Ahaha because I'm not a quasi-spiritual virgin who's scared of the real world without his stories to protect him, I am a woman?
Am I also cringe if I do something graceful and in vogue, and fedora if I be really down to Earth and accepting of others?
Learn to insult people accurately moron.

>rationing out wealth would render charity unnecessary
my sides

>helping the poor is egoistic and stupid
>we should instead end poverty

ok but how

PURE IDEOLOGY

>My families wealth comes from a long line of hard work
read: swindling the goy

>implying it's not a hard work to swindle the goy

FULL COMMUNISM

>What are you Marxists'?

Yes

gay

wait a second you're not really ayn rand

sticky this shit

I wish every time I wrote off late night take out as a business expense I would get praise.