Thoughts on this FB meme?

Thoughts on this FB meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

blogs.nature.com/news/2011/06/did_stephen_jay_gould_fudge_hi.html
lesswrong.com/lw/kv/beware_of_stephen_j_gould/
nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html
psychologytoday.com/blog/the-folly-fools/201210/fraud-in-the-imputation-fraud
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

but that's wrong

Einstein was literally the end result of centuries of Ashkenazi jew sexual selection

Pretty much bullshit
I mean let's look at all the black Einsteins right now.
The slaves were freed almost 200 years ago and have had opportunities equivalent to poor whites for about 60 years, yet poor whites are far more likely to excel in the sciences than their black counterparts. There is a single black Nobel Prize winner outside of "peace" and "literature" anjd that was in economics.
So despite all of our efforts to pole vault blacks into science, they just don't do that well.
No matter how much money we pour into inner city schools, no matter how much we separate those schools into branches to try to push forward those who do well...it just doesn't work. Polytechs, charter schools, private schools, relocating black inner city students into the county and into white schools...still nothing and that is just in the US and not even to mention the schools in Africa.
Now I am not saying this is a bad thing, because they still do well. But to say that they would have an equivalence is an absurd notion.
The "talent" in the context of that quote is pure genetic

Such brilliance only arise from centuries of wonderful genes hard work and a certain environment, not sporadic.

>centuries of wonderful genes
Its also gonna happen by chance a certain percent of the time

Read the memery again paisan, no one's saying that all races are equal. That notion is absurd on the face of it.

It's just a statistical certainty. The vast majority of the human population did not and does not have the opportunity to pursue higher education. There probably were at least two "Einsteins" amongst them.

And dont forget people who just didn't want to and became.. criminal masterminds or something instead. If they were really good at it they would never have got caught and we would never have known about them.

It takes a certain kind of person to be a genius and still desire to enter into an environment thats mostly just people who think they are smarter than they are acting smug about it.

This will probably be one of my last posts in Veeky Forums for a while so here goes:

1.Blacks aren't really the science type. Not only do you need intelligence, but you also need an introverted personality. Blacks are easily bored and need constant stimulation.

2.Until very recently there wasn't much reason for most people to become scientists. Until like the 80s most STEM jobs paid shit. Now that they pay good the SJWs are constantly pushing women and nonwhites into them.

3.Blacks are really designed for short lifespans. You don't dedicate yourself to quantum mechanics when you have a good chance of dying before 30. Instead, you have sex with any fat slut you can and sell dimebags to make slightly more than minimum wage.

Yeah pot whites that got enslaved by some niggers. We want reparations now.

yea its all whitey fault

*poor whites
Fucking phone

...

Your ideas are shit and good riddance

/thread

This made me lol, thank you user. I know you cannot be serious so I rest easy in laughing.

Einstein was an outlier. There is no path from ordinary to outlier.

Mods! Why aren't these threads taken down!

>need to be introverted
No you don't you autist

>You don't dedicate yourself to quantum mechanics when you have a good chance of dying before 30.
but all decent physicists/mathematicians did their magnum opus contribution before 30

t. Hardy

>It's pure genetics
As a black person, nope.
In the black community you literally have the choice of: Be successful
or:
Have a fulfilling social life

Guess what most normalfags choose, in any race?
"acting white" isn't just a meme, but I wouldn't expect non-blacks to know about it.

Quick reminder that John Van Neumann the man who basically vanguard 20th century mathematics/ information science and Veeky Forums's champion received neither a fields medal nor a Nobel prize during his lifetime.

So the idea that you can wholly measure the worth of a person or population by the type of popular meme accolades they aquire is laughable and makes you look like the biggest faggot.

The fact you decided to step on your soap box to make this only about blacks shows the chip on your shoulder.

But since we're on the subject take into consideration that the only documented black human calculator was an American slave who when finally found was of old age and the academics and reporters who found him lamented the wasted potential that transpired.

That is exactly what op's pic is talking about. Not the masses per se but the unknown individuals with the hidden wits to contribute greatly but are never given the opportunity because the need for nations to sacrifice them to economic gods.

Talent in physics or mathematics (or any technical skill for that matter) is not found in a field. It is learned and fostered within the individual who takes the time to master their subject. Einstein did this. Field workers did not have the opportunity for this. It would be an abuse of language o say they had "equal talent" to one of the greatest physicists who ever lived or ever will live.
The potential to become as talented? Perhaps, but potential wasted might as well have never existed.

>Implying Einstein wasn't an anomaly himself
You act as if Einsteins and von Neumanns are common. Besides, how did this become about blacks?

Mods know these posts are bait, but they know if they start banning them then the baiters will eventually leave and the site will lose ad revenue.

"cotton fields"

thus the discussion was instantly racialized, albeit subtly

well that's kind of his specialization, debating against the idea that races have differing and inborn likelihoods of achieving general genius.
kind of hard to do that without talking about the races that exist.

So basically is an idiot who only equates cotton fields with blacks despite South Amerindians and Central Asians also having a history with cotton.

>Veeky Forums's hero
You mean Jacob Barnett?

my grandma picked cotton for like $.50 a day shes white

fifty cents then were worth like $20 today, so pretty good

at least she was being paid

Why is having a social life and being successful such divergent experiences?
What would you do to fix this

...

reading comprehension isn't your thing is it?

im sure a bright young mind like yourself excels in other areas.

Einstein is seriously overrated. Sure he was smarter than me, but there are thousands of people alive today just as smart or even smarter. He's just famous for his theory which is cool and all but even he didnt wasn't right about everything.
The low hanging fruits of physics are gone, it's just impossible to get credited with some super ground breaking theory today.

Today's physicists are basically just trying to prove theories from 50+ years ago and maybe patching some minor loopholes


Anyway, back to OPs pic. If he wants to play a numbers game like that you wouldn't invest in niggers anyways. Sure there might be a few smart niggers around but percentage wise there are more smarter whites, jews and Asians. If you want the most bang for your bux the choice is obvious.

Gould destroyed any credibility he had by faking evidence and lying about his results. No-one should give a single shit what he thought.

>The low hanging fruits of physics are gone, it's just impossible to get credited with some super ground breaking theory today.
You don't FUCKING know that

>No matter how much money we pour into inner city schools, no matter how much we separate those schools into branches to try to push forward those who do well...it just doesn't work.

Have you tried waiting? No?

>by faking evidence and lying about his results

[citation needed]

blogs.nature.com/news/2011/06/did_stephen_jay_gould_fudge_hi.html
lesswrong.com/lw/kv/beware_of_stephen_j_gould/
nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html
psychologytoday.com/blog/the-folly-fools/201210/fraud-in-the-imputation-fraud
> In his own empirical work attacking others for biased data analysis in the service of political ideology—it is he who is guilty of bias in service of political ideology (Jason Lewis and colleagues 2011). What is worse—and more shocking—is that Steve’s errors are very extensive and the bias very serious. A careful reanalysis shows that his target is unblemished while his own attack is biased in all the ways Gould attributes to his victim.

WE

>waiting while the nog menace tears your inner cities apart

Reminder that that CRACKA Einstein fucked his cousin and ripped off all his scientific theories from other sources.

>what is genetics
>what is an education