If anyone who thinks Mensa is legit has an IQ of -1/12. IQ test are made up by some shit tier psychology majors. That's like having monkey testing a smart human being. We don't need IQ test to measure our IQ we need an equation that calculates your IQ. Your IQ is based on many factors and one BIG factor is the structure of your brain. I would say your IQ is proportional to the density of your brain, the speed the neurons fire, the temperature of your brain, and how much drugs you take. Can we figure out an equation to measure one's IQ?
If anyone who thinks Mensa is legit has an IQ of -1/12. IQ test are made up by some shit tier psychology majors...
Why would a theoretical prediction be better than and experimental value? It would be more effective to design a better intelligence test.
No, intelligence test are extremely ambiguous.
brainlet mad because he scored shit
"and how much drugs you take"
what did he mean by this?
RETARD
Surveys don't provide you with experimental values, though.
Ironically, though, IQ tests do exactly what OP is describing.
>t. Brainlet
''Im not dumb, I'm just bad at taking tests
>drugs you take
hue
I am skeptical of IQ tests, the idea of measuring intelligence seems prone to error imo, but I don't think it would be wise to outright dismiss Mensa and other related organizations. I think to fix the idea of IQ would be by re-defining "IQ." After all, intelligence is an abstract notion, and if people cant agree on a concrete definition then an objective test cannot be created.
report low IQ brainlet threads
sage low IQ brainlet threads
hide low IQ brainlet threads
im only 20 iq pts behind a man (einstein) who debunked the majority of physics by thinking about trains. And seeing as physics deals with true complexity and other science do not, its even more reasonable for a 140 to be able to trash your kind than it was for a 160 to trash physics ;)
if ur iq was above 140 u wouldnt be as butthurt about the concept of a 140 hyp grad lurking this beta barn..
so the logical conclusion is that ur iq is lower than 140 (possibly much lower)
if you met me in real life you would instantly be blown into a world where all that mattered was getting me to acknowledge your existence and even hopefully be your friend... But i would probably find you to be a desperately uninteresting person and want you to exit my awareness as fast as possible.
the fact that i dont lie about my iq is what gives me the edge necessary to call you an inferior little girl who couldnt understand basic physics, and BE RIGHT ABOUT IT.
honestly if i woke up one morning and for some reason my thinking capacity had devolved to your level, it would take me less than 5 min to run to the kitchen and slit my throat...
maybe your going to tell me u work at goldman..
but ud still be way inferior, as is anybody who projects their iq to be higher than it is..
maybe thats the point, inferiorboy ;)
What are your opinions concerning Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences? True, bullshit, or something else?
Some truth, some bullshit
IQ is a social construct used to differentiate one type of mind set from all other mind sets using a scale.
Meaning that one IQ test may result in high scores for 1 person but anther IQ test won't because it is structured from the ground up to be testing a different type of mind set.
You could train a neural network to recognize posts that are smarter or "dumber" than yourself. Then compute the IQ of all Veeky Forums posts with a normal distribution.
This is just idea that I'll try right now. It could be fun to automatically catch quality posts on Veeky Forums and send an alert somehow.
guys, he thinks IQ is real
WE PASTA NOW
Those stupid pot stoner kids in school did better than him and wahhh it's not fair
How do you propose to train this network without bias in your labeling?
ITT:
Got a good score: IQ is real blah blah blah
Got a bad score: KEK he actually thinks IQ is real blah blah blah
Got a good score but saw someone with a higher score denounce it: IQ doesnt mean anything i should know blah blah blah
My score was higher than any other posted in this thread, and I still believe IQ to be meaningless.
i didn't give you permission to reply to me. listen, it was entertaining, first. hell, it was actually funny.
but now i'm getting the feeling that you actually think that you're on my level. from the day i was born, i was destined for success, you little shit. i was brought into this world by a software engineer and and a prominent actuary, both of norwegian descent. from the moment that the fucking curtains were raised, i was set to dominate the stem fields. and because i had guardians that actually cared about me, i flourished. pretty soon, i was placed into a special school of correspondence, specifically i.m gelfand's school for gifted children in new england. i not only reached my parents' expectations, but i passed them with flying colors. i had raw talent. i was fucking better. i was surrounded by 6th graders, many from hong kong, whom were smarter than half the posters in this fucking thread. and now, where am i?
in mit, getting my double bs in electrical engineering and physics, with a stanford-binet tested iq of 147 at age 17.
get this through your head: you are nothing. i am worth more than your entire goddamn family. i'm smarter than you, better looking than you, taller than you, wealthier than you, and more employable than you. while you type out another post to get cheap laughs, i'll be simultaneously working with the brightest minds in the world and fornicating with my beautiful girlfriend. it gets on my nerves when people pretend to be better than me.
know your place, you fucking vermin. never, ever reply to my posts, again.
This.
but..but....thats just from the right...
>t. Got a low score on the test
We don't have the smallest grasp or understanding of how the brain works. What we can do is try to measure what it can do, using metrics that we believe correlate best with intelligence in general, such as pattern recognition. Then we compare how quickly all humans can accomplish this and rank. That is IQ. The test has been improved and refined for about a century now.
It is a good predictor of life success and happiness, statistically speaking. Not much else you can ask for given our limited understanding of our own brain.
...
I think the best would be to use the Elo rating system (or similar). For example it could be an interactive shell that displays two posts, asks for the best one and repeats until there are enough connections to predict the ranking of the others.
>my score __was__ higher than any other posted in __this__ thread
>past tense of current event
>no one even posted their IQ
could this mean you are a brainlet?
find out next time on dragon ball z
Kek, mensa.
95% of brainlet "muh 140 IQ after 2 attempts" test takers havent even taken the real IQ tests. The ones that are so hard they aren't even timed and are expected to take days to complete, with no answers (or "hints," you god damn brainlets) available online.
But dont mind me, just stick to your cookie-cutter Ravens matrices with the same patterns you've seen 500 times before, aka the 135 IQ tests. Don't try the 160+ tests, you'll just fry out and rage quit when you dont see a single pattern question.
Mensa is a social club for autists, but iq is a real thing that can be accurately measured and that correlates extremely closely to lifetime success, to problem solving ability, and to perceived "brightness".
It also means being able to learn memes faster.
>I would say your IQ is proportional to the density of your brain,
Doesn't seem to matter, iq is strongly linked to the ratio of brain size to body size, ie, a big brain doesn't mean high iq if it's on a big body but likewise a small brain can be exceptional on a small body.
>the speed the neurons fire,
iq is not "speed of thought", which is often "comorbid" with iq but not always.
>the temperature of your brain, and how much drugs you take.
Damage to the brain reduces iq in a measurable way, for example the ~5 point malus for chronic weed smokers is well attested.
>Can we figure out an equation to measure one's IQ?
Apparently, yes, because the equations that underlie modern iq tests do produce reliable and consistent measures.
After doing well in college for a year, I got kicked out during my second year because I stopped going to class and started arguing with professors. I tried to explain to my mom that school was for stupid sheep, but she sent me to a psychiatrist anyway. Well, my psychiatrist couldn't follow anything I said, so he concluded I was either an idiot or schizo. To figure out which, he gave me an IQ test. He later told me that I had an IQ in the 99.9th percentile and that I should take anti-psychotics.
When considering whether to take anti-psychotics or not, I realized that the psychiatrist had told me exactly what I wanted to hear:
>I'm a genius but [insert meme here]
I wasn't crazy, just insecure about my intelligence. I also realized that if I wanted to live a good life, I would have to find a way to cope with not being all that spectacularly smart.
I think I'm doing better today -- if for no other reason than I've realized that the IQ test didn't really make sense as an IQ test (he really just asked me to define some words and to explain some concepts) which means not only that my IQ is probably not in the 99.9th percentile, but also that he completely understood me and knew exactly what I needed to hear. I'm not misunderstood, just not super smart.
might be to correct for the influence of adderall and nootropics in general; just counting drugs as a bad decision to lower the result and not taking any other life choices into consideration would be too silly
People don't understand that IQ doesn't measure intelligence per se. IQ test measures a person IQ. However, the reason why they are so useful is because we know that IQ tests are highly g-loaded. A person's g-factor is the REAL scientific measurement of intelligence. The psychometric construct of g, has been found to have numerous correlate, has been consistent, and has predictive powers, and the reason why statistical analysis is such a big thing in psychometrics. Maybe looking up "g factor" is what you're looking for OP? Cause otherwise, I don't understand a thing your post is saying.
>If anyone who thinks Mensa is legit has an IQ of -1/12.
Such people would be part of Mensa tho, because you need more than 130 IQ and those people have 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6... IQ
Anyone have a reasonably accurate online test for IQ?
I'm interested, but not enough to pay for one.
lemonparty.org
Nigga i asked for an iq test, not your personal blog.
165+ IQ here. The only ones who deny the validity of IQ tests are ones who got results lower than they expected.
>if I agree then it's true
You just proved IQ means shit when it comes to rational thinking.
The only people I've encountered who actually go around advocating for the validity of IQ tests are borderline autistic 'gifted' kids who end up doing multiple masters degrees and are unable to hold down an actual job.
I scored 140. IQ is a bullshit circle-jerk.
Stephen Hawking types at like one-word-per-minute with the little muscle-control left in his cheek. One of the indisputable great minds of our century spent eight minutes twitching his face to write this:
"People who boast about their IQ are losers"
You should take those anti psychotics user.
You need to go back to high school english