Irl literature memes that set you the fuck off

bears, raymond

HoD is so shockingly bad

it's like the original Battlefield 1

Moby's problem isn't that it's bad but it's just not something you can marathon. You have to put that shit down and walk away from time to time otherwise you will loathe it by the time it's over.

Explain

we wuz colonialism

weren't they?

white guilt liberal bullshit, that's the comparison

also it's just funny comparing books to battlefield 1

>white guilt liberal bullshit
Fuck off, Conrad never tried to shove some agenda down anyone's throat. Merely humanizing niggers is not the same as trying to force white guilt on the reader. If you find it unfair that Belgian colonialism was criticized, please reconsider

no but that's why anyone payed attention to it

obviously belgian colonialism wasn't very nice, you don't need to read a shitty book to find that out

>no but that's why anyone paid attention to it
Has nothing to do with the book being "shockingly bad", as you put it
>obviously belgian colonialism wasn't very nice, you don't need to read a shitty book to find that out
Luckily, that's not what the book is about, either. Did you read it?

its more humanity iz shite but i didn't finish it because the prose was the real crime against humanity in heart of darkness

Yeah, I agree. I liked his encounter with Kurtz, though, you should at least have skipped to that before you put it down.

>3.4 avg
bad?

Battlefield 1 is horribly bad

it´s like Full Metal Jacket

Literally never got through the first chapter of Moby Dick. It's too verbose and long-winded. "You could say I was feeling hungry, nay rather desiring, though perhaps it'd be better described as a certain, peculiar craving for the desires of the stomach, "the tummy" as I'd rather have it expressed." This is how I remember lines from that awful book.

anyone who drops it before ishmael cuddles the cannibal is irrelevant

>Verbose is bad
Shouldn't you go back to sffg?

...

triggered plebs

Source?

>the Iliad and Odyssey are inconsistent products of a long oral tradition and not infallible literal and historical truth directly inspired by the Daughter of Zeus herself
Fuck. Off.

Heart of Darkness IS good, you fucking philistine

b-but /pol/ said it's lefty propaganda!

Anyone who reads HoD without realizing that the Africans are mere background noise is trapped so far in the matrix they will never get out. Liberal and Conservative alike.

have some fucking discernment. i bet you think sandman and transmetropolitan are good comics

I bet you think you can provide good reasons why they are not.

>the olympian pantheon isn't real

no, i can't. i win

>not giggling at American whalers being ridiculously eloquent

HEART OF DARKNESS ISN'T EVEN ABOUT NIGGERS AND YOU ARE TOO FUCKING STUPID TO UNDERSTAND IT
RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

i already know that dipshit and said so

>That book is terrible!
>Let me bring up comic books for no reason!
How to get no one to take you seriously 101

I'm not a fan of homosexual metaphor erotica.

Yeah, it's about going black and never coming back.

>he thinks it's actually about colonialism
yeah and Invisible Man is about racism and Moby Dick is about whaling and Ulysses is just about a dude walking around town.
wayda not make it through the bitch-filter.

read it again. colonialism is just the framework for something bigger.

moby dick IS about whaling

(and i wasn't saying it was about colonialism only that's why it got play, being a bad book)

Goodreads ratings only seem to range from 3 to 4.5, thanks to averaging. Anything below a 4 is usually a red flag.

>humanity iz shite
That's not it, dummy. It's "humans will do whatever they delude themselves into doing". There's a reason Marlow is compared to a Buddha by the narrator. The thing about Kurtz is that with only empty words he was capable of establishing a cult and scaring the shit out of Marlow; yet even a man like that died like any other. Civilization is no different: like Kurtz's Intended they delude themselves into thinking they are meant for something great and so they trample on whatever comes under their feet for their love of ideas.

>“Mind,” he began again, lifting one arm from the elbow, the palm of the hand outwards, so that, with his legs folded before him, he had the pose of a Buddha preaching in European clothes and without a lotus-flower—“Mind, none of us would feel exactly like this. What saves us is efficiency—the devotion to efficiency. But these chaps were not much account, really. They were no colonists; their administration was merely a squeeze, and nothing more, I suspect. They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force—nothing to boast of, when you have it, since your strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others. They grabbed what they could get for the sake of what was to be got. It was just robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale, and men going at it blind—as is very proper for those who tackle a darkness. The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much. What redeems it is the idea only. An idea at the back of it; not a sentimental pretence but an idea; and an unselfish belief in the idea—something you can set up, and bow down before, and offer a sacrifice to....”

At the end of the day all the "development" the empire makes is only used to extract a pile of elephant teeth and crush whoever's in the way. If you're scared by Kurtz last words you have been memed and that's exactly what the book tries to convey.

>obviously belgian colonialism wasn't very nice, you don't need to read a shitty book to find that out
Didn't the book actually raise a lot of awareness about what was going on in the Congo?

like i said i never finished it :^)

but "humanity iz shite" is pretty close to "humanity iz delusional"

i remain unmemed

>but "humanity iz shite" is pretty close to "humanity iz delusional"
Not really. The first one is oppressive. The second can be liberating.

Are you saying that this "delusion" is a bad thing? Delusional men are the ones that are considered the greatest, can the delusion of greatness be truly illusory?

Bad for what exactly?

>can the delusion of greatness be truly illusory?
I don't understand your question.

>warriors is better than tailchaser's song

Most just don't understand lit so Moby Dick is an example of that.

...