Global warming is causing all this cold! Don't you know anything?

I post peered reviewed charts, you post cartoons...
You're on the wrong board Those aren't phrases, those are names. Grade three grammar.
Ok, so what exactly is your point? Is this board general mechanics or science? Your attempt to deflect is typical, and pathetic.

Still waiting...

Who exactly will pay you for your "skills"?

Nice buzzwords

So, if the engine on your car is running hot, than somewhere in that warmer than average system, there's a "cold spot", that's cooler than it would be on average?

Sounds legit.

No. We're saying that the closed Earth system has an uneven distribution of energy, and that although there are spots that can be colder than normal, the overall system can still be heating up.

In your example, it would be like saying you've just started the engine, there are spots that are higher than normal, and yes, that anomaly has not yet distributed evenly.

You're comparing an evolving system with one that has already matured.

Apples and oranges.

>it's another retards at /pol/ trying to raid Veeky Forums with IQ's equal to the room temperature thanks to the global warming episode

You know if you teens stopped following shitty narratives to find a meaning for your empty lives actually studied to learn things you would be more helpful to the cause you're supposedly supporting right?

>I post peered reviewed charts
It's like you can't make a post without lying. Pathetic.

>graph stops at 1855
>see, recent warming is tiny!
this has been posted and thoroughly debunked so many times I have to conclude you're just trolling. 2/10

>peer reviewed charts
ackshually you didn't. think you did? show me one peer-reviewed paper authored by David Lappi, who made the chart. show me one peer-reviewed paper that contains the chart in question. protip: you can't.
>so what exactly is your point
that guy's point is that heating an object can actually cause parts of it to cool. which is why global warming causing localized cooling is perfectly reasonable.

I.Q. 132, sanctioned test. I'm more than bright enough to be here.
Can you actually answer questions, or just constantly deflect them?
I'll ask this again. Who or what exactly, funds all this "climate science"?

Uhh... ExxonMobil? It's ExxonMobil, right?