ITT we post quackery

ITT we post quackery

I'll start us off with the field of "Real" numbers, which is actually logically inconsistent with itself.

Other urls found in this thread:

math.stackexchange.com/questions/472957/the-continuum-hypothesis-the-axiom-of-choice
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>the field of "Real" numbers is actually logically inconsistent with itself.
Yup, that's some gold-standard quackery right there.

This

>a number that does not exist

Top kek.

The non-finitist quacks have arrived, everybody.

Since no one else is posting: The continuum hypothesis, which is less of an hypothesis and more of a conjecture by uneducated morons who refuse to work with other axioms than the ones their professors taught them decades ago.

>which is actually logically inconsistent with itself.
Derive false from your favorite axiomatization of the reals of GTFO.

Real number are sequences of digits that are not rational.
Hows is this difficult to understand.

Brainlet.

Here's your reply, now get out.

0.999(9) = 1