I got a paper rejected today. No errors found. One reviewer gave a green light, but another said that the contribution was low and the editor decided to stick with the second one.
Feels bad. No errors. Still a rejection. Yes another half a year is lost.
Seems that it's impossible to start a new topic even in mid-tear journals. Have to lower standards even more.
Josiah Morales
Literally just submit to another journal. Work on your next paper.
Connor Reed
fucking nerd
Christian Brooks
What field is this?
>half a year lost
Is it experimental work?
William Campbell
Submit to a different journal
Colton Diaz
Math
James Davis
What area were/are you researching?
Angel Bailey
Something related to theoretical CS
Hudson Stewart
is it up on arxiv yet? if yes, link
Luis White
Are you serious?
Landon Russell
yes this isn't biology, your being the primal source is secured by an arxiv post and you probably can't make money with your findings
Thomas Ramirez
Triple integrals?
Robert Howard
Even better, triple recursion.
Ayden Nelson
Sorry, but I prefer to keep my name unknown. Is it not natural?
Andrew Jones
"No errors" is the absolute baseline for being not complete trash, not an indication that it should be accepted. "No errors" is the "nice guy" of reviewing: It is just next to "shit".
>another said that the contribution was low this on the other side is valuable feedback
>impossible to start a new topic even in mid-tear journals >theoretical cs If it is new, go to a conferences like everybody in CS and get your feedback there
Colton Phillips
well, it doesn't really matter on Veeky Forums. I've posted videos and called for reading and participation, nothing bad comes from it
Jaxon Evans
This. CS disseminate research in top conferences not journals.
Isaiah Perez
It's somewhat related to it, but it's not CS. Nevermind.
Cameron Reyes
Just post it, remove the name if you are a paranoid faggot
James Bailey
...
Samuel Anderson
It got rejected for the first time and you're already complaining? I hope you dont play in the lottery.
Adam White
if you're confident in your work can you actually post it?
thanks
Ian James
he's gonna be in for a wild ride if he wants to keep publishing
manuscripts rejected all the time
Landon Evans
Where do you people get financing if you get regular rejections?
Matthew Sanders
What's stopping the person who reads your paper to evaluate it from claiming it as their own?
Jackson Diaz
Rejection is a part of the process I think, I would guess that's how it is with journals anyway. I guess you would just apply to the next one. They're selective of what they publish. I'm just talking in general though, I don't know how it is in the science world
Jacob Robinson
The editor.
Aiden Reyes
It is, didn't mean to ask it in a demeaning way, just wondering how things working in academic fields, since it's not where I'm (nor am heading to).
Good luck OP, don't be disheartened by a failure. Rant it for awhile, and onwards.
Michael Scott
this
Benjamin Walker
eyyy I know you. Well done man, love ya
Leo Flores
I got a rejection on fucking Christmas. Came from Australia so I guess it was the 26th. Reviews were 2/3 good but the journal had like a 10% acceptance rate. Basically if its a top 5 journal you'll need all the reviewers to agree. Even a reject and two accept w/ minor revisions has a high probability of rejection by the HE.
Anthony Lewis
Can we read it?
Xavier Diaz
sure
Evan Thomas
post it
Isaiah Myers
Just got my first journal manuscript accepted with revisions. I had 2 reviewers accept and 1 decline. I guess the editor thought 2/3 was good enough.
The revisions are due on Monday. My adviser is reviewing my changes now.
I'm kinda worried because I did not make a bunch of the changes they requested. But I have good reasons for not doing them and I explained in my comments to reviewers. I guess we'll see what happens.
Jeremiah Bell
I regret to inform you that your paper on, "Extraterrestrial Objects and Their Effects on Anal Stimulation" was denied for publication due to use of confidential data used by the United States Air Force.
William Anderson
I had a really great idea for something in my field. It didn't require any ressources either so I worked on it in my free time. When I was half way done after like 4 month of putting every free minute into it, someone else published the same Idea I had. Literally everything was the same. Still mad about this
Logan Evans
>I did not make a bunch of the changes they requested The absolute mettman.