Science is kind of bullshit

Right? I mean, it's pretty good for describing phenomenon, and predicting their occurrence... but it's bullshit.

Prove me wrong (right).

Prove you wrong for what? Of your opinion?

That empirical science is not, on it's face, bullshit

It's great for making things like microwaves, but it's just useless for determining absolute truths. We know gravity works because it deforms space-time, but we don't know why the fuck it does that. Even the scientific model of gravity is kind of shitty, because it can't explain the rotational speed of the outer rim of the galaxy (the stars should be flying into space but don't). We need to make up shit like Dark Matter to make it fit.

Before you get on my ass, Dark Matter is absolutely invented horseshit.

>conventionalism
>empricism

If you continue on the same plane everything is bullshit
But science is still less bullshit than anything

Yeah the extreme trust on science might be misleading for brainlets, but still it is still necessary for pragmatic reasons

Do you really think you're educated enough to state "the scientific model of gravity is kind of shitty"?

You're saying shit like "it can't do this, it can't do that, blah blah blah" but do you really understand what you're saying? You just read some pop-sci article and now you think that you're qualified to discuss the intricacies of modern gravitational theory?

You're free to address my criticism, but please don't engage in attacks on my character, thanks.

Define absolute truth.

There is no language to do so yet. That is one of the problems with science. It relies too much on the language of math which, while again useful, is not adequate.

You can not explain why a flower is beautiful with maths.

Making shit up is literally hiw science works. Built on crackpot ideas.

You also misuse absolute truths and misidentify a strength as a flaw. Go back to your mothers teet paeon