OI OP I KNOW YOU WERE AT THE H3 LECTURE. I KNOWW BITCH.
the prof is cool thou
Well Veeky Forums?
Jayden White
Grayson Lewis
>why
1) it isn't a limit because the perimeter is constant
2) even if the perimeter would vary, this would only give the upper limit
Bentley Jackson
yeah, you're right
Tyler Martinez
-1/12
Caleb Lopez
Fuck you I was going to post this
Gabriel Scott
>1) it isn't a limit because the perimeter is constant
That's what I thought, you have no idea why it's wrong.
The answer to OP problem is none is left. For any marble K, it will be removed at step number K. Conclusion, no marble is left.
Ayden Baker
That statement is not fundamentally different from saying "There exists an infinitely large set of countable objects. Count them one by one and never stop. Then say how many you have."
Instead of thinking of a jar that you're putting numbers in, think first that you have an infinite jar that you're taking them out from. The numbers already all exist, and it doesn't matter in which jar they are. At every step along the way in both cases, you'll have infinitely many left to go, but the only thing that matters is that you're going through all of them without skipping any.
Easton Rodriguez
If the jar has infinite marbles labeled 1-10 then how do I put 1-10 into the jar without taking it out first
Luis Foster
The jar can hold infinite marbles, but it is empty at the beginning.
Kayden Sullivan
An infinite number of marbles, says so in the first sentence.
Whatever you do to the marbles after that is never gonna change that.