High IQ correlates with not having sex

gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php

Feels pretty damn good now knowing that I'm smarter than all those faggots having girlfriends and sex. Fucking brainlets, ayy lmao.

>Depending on the specific age and gender, an adolescent with an IQ of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than a teen with a score of 120 or 130. Each additional point of IQ increased the odds of virginity by 2.7% for males and 1.7% for females. But higher IQ had a similar relationship across the entire range of romantic/sexual interactions, decreasing the odds that teens had ever kissed or even held hands with a member of the opposite sex at each age.

>By the age of 19, 80% of US males and 75% of women have lost their virginity, and 87% of college students have had sex. But this number appears to be much lower at elite (i.e. more intelligent) colleges. According to the article, only 56% of Princeton undergraduates have had intercourse. At Harvard 59% of the undergraduates are non-virgins, and at MIT, only a slight majority, 51%, have had intercourse. Further, only 65% of MIT graduate students have had sex.

Other urls found in this thread:

emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The-decay-of-Western-civilization-final.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

Kind of makes you think, will mankind become dumber over time seeing as how the smarter breed less?

That's just and excuse for losers to think they have high IQ. The truth is IQ and having sex are in no way connected and generally measuring intelligence with IQ is stupid. Intelligent people probably don't give a fuck about IQ

>The truth is IQ and having sex are in no way connected
Then why does data say otherwise?

Yeah, he just described how he is proud to be the intro. to the movie Idiocracy.

Being proud of being stupid. It's really a new low for this world.

No, because while the dipshits having lots of sex have lots of children, the smart people are busy building societies and leaving them in the dust with technology

Until the next generation of retards inherits the society

smart people breeding less is a very recent thing, with the marxists pushing dysgenics

whoa i must be a genius for being a 22 year old virgin then

i have to break the news to my father

Oh, you mean like western civilisation ?
The civilisation that opens its borders to all the subhumans of the world ?

Fuck, i hope the east asians won't be retarded like us europeans once we successfully complete our self-genocide.

Thanks for sharing /pol/ :)

your penis shrinks the harder you think.

Sure, traitor to Humanity.
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The-decay-of-Western-civilization-final.pdf

>uses statistics to prove IQ is relative to chances of getting a girlfriend/losing virginity
>doesn't go talk to girls because of retarded theory based on obscure statistics
>must be my IQ

At the age of 15, I achieved an IQ of 145 using the Australian national IQ test, yeah pretty shitty testing methods, and questions I probably wouldn't relate so much to IQ, but it was still far above the average. Lost my virginity before 18, because you know, I socialize.
Statistics are just a way to bend the truth in your favor.

Can someone explain to me how the hell a man or woman without brain damage can have an IQ sub 80? Wasn't there some monkey taught sign language that had an 80 IQ?

While you ask how, a thousand slipped through the border today.

It is the weak who are fast-breeding, as a defense against their individual inferiority, like lower life forms that produce thousands of offspring hoping a few survive.

It is the duty of the strong to cull the weak.

where do you keep getting these pictures i need more

>non-virgin brainlet trying to justify his low iq with some bullshit shitposter national """IQ""" test
lmao

No smart people have diminished impulses thus fuck less than normal people who fuck less than idiots.

Nutrition/iodine deficiency during prenatal period.

Wrong, smart people make more income but because society does not subsidise people in the 70-120k range in terms of child expenses they have less kids.

Which isn't unique to the West, happens in East Asian countries too. It's just expensive time and money wise to have kids.

>It's just expensive time and money wise to have kids.

So people with impulse control would not have those kids.

People without impulse control would accidentally have kids despite the fact that they can't really afford them.

This makes sense for the Asians.

Average East Asian with glasses walking down the street: 155 IQ.

Now if they could have an EQ to match as well...

An IQ below 80 is common, as should be obvious if you know how IQ works. Only two-thirds of the population is in the range 85-115, and there are equal amounts above and below that range. There are entire countries that have an average below 80. Furthermore, in practical reality, IQ isn't calibrated to a true global standard, but the average set point is determined mostly from successful and orderly first-world nations.

The average person with Down Syndrome has an IQ of 50, and they are considered to have only mild to moderate intellectual disability. There are much more severe forms of mental retardation.

The current definition of intellectual disability (mental retardation) is an IQ under 70 in combination with two or more defects of adaptive behavior relevant to everyday life. Some whole countries hover around 70 as an average, but the people are still capable of raising crops, storing and preparing food, etc. whereas people with intellectual disability would fail to function as even a primitive society.

No smart people act the way they do because they have reduced instincts compared to idiots who are mostly instinct. That is why morons are always socially competent where as most smart people have issues because they lack the socialization impulse. Geniuses are basically aliens in human bodies because there is not much impulse based thought in their heads at all.

The fundamental premise of "Idiocracy." I'm not sure I like being smart.

> B-But my mom said that IQ doesn't matter!

when will this meme end?

>Political Science
>73
>Studio Art
>at literal 0

I am curious about their methodology when it comes to the Art Studio sample now.

Most high IQ people (>=130) look something like this. Out of shape, skinny fat, fat, bad fashion sense, have negative thoughts on women (since they aren't shown any attention), self-loathing, autistic (study math 24/7, shit post on Veeky Forums) and have extremely high standards of who they'd date.

No wonder they are virgins in their late 20s.

>have extremely high standards of who they'd date

I think you might have an STD.

High IQ, girl, I don't care about IQ, autistic, not self-loathing, good fashion sense, and low standards.
But I agree with you. I went to a special school for "geniuses" when I was a kid. In retrospective, we were a bunch of misfits whose only goal in life was to study and be "elite". After that experience, I just wanted to meet ""normal"" people. I hope someday world will stop with stupid IQ standards (even if I know it won't).

IQ correlates with all measures of social success besides reproductive it has been statistically evident since at least the Bell Curve was released.

ELON MUSKED
L
O
N

M
U
S
K
E
D

Feyntlemen

boobs or gtfo

...

Thank god for porn, or I'd never have never learned what a pussy looks like.

>It is the duty of the strong to cull the weak.
How you finna cull a nigga if you skinnfat ass can't even lift a gun.

I'm a high IQ, skinny-fat, grad school autist, but I still haven't been single since I was ~16. Women truly are the simplest machines.

37% sounds incredibly low for CS...

There's correlation but not a causal link

Jesus Christ did this hit home

:^)