I'm not convinced

I'm not convinced.

I claim you always have 1/3 chance of winning the car.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WyoF-7rmakA
youtube.com/watch?v=FAljAvR3L4s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Well, if you're not convinced, do the experiment yourself and see what your findings are.

Nobody asked you for your opinion.

A thread like this pops up once a day, can you stop fucking shitposting please.

This situation has been tried and tested many many times, and each thread ends in the same explanations.

Do a computer simulation if you don't believe it and see for yourself.

It's a fucking proven theorem, get your head out of your ass.

There are two doors. If you open both the chance of winning the car is 100%, but according to you, it's 66%.

My experiment gives me 1/3 chance of winning for both staying with your option and switching your option.

I used "random.org" to randomize me number from 1 to 3.

Okay brainlet, here we go. Say there were a hundred doors. Pick one

There's no such option as "opening two doors". Why do you think solution to this problem is found by asserting solution by definition to your unrelated question?

There are only 3 doors. I'll pick door 1 and stick with it. Doors 2 and 3 will remain unselected.

Its a fucking thought experiment to help your tiny brain understand basic probability. Pick a door retard

At every moment, either you are alive or you are dead. Thus, in a second, you will die with probability 1/2.

Conditional probabilities, not even once.