Books everyone recommends, but no one reads

Came here to post this.

Tfw I've read two books mentioned so far cover-to-cover. BTFO

which ones? i've ready every book posted so far cover-to-cover so i can test your knowledge

Rudin and the Bible? Or was it algorithms and the Bible?

libraryofbabel.info/
Pretty sure nobody's really read the entire thing. Pretty sure anyway ....

...

This is true. I didn't get this book until after I already learned most of everything in it.

It is a great reference, but I never liked it for trying to straight up read through and learn from.

I read Rudin up to the Lebesgue part.
The book's great.

> the Bible
> not the Greeks

every single book by K. Marx

I read it several times

true
Slightly true
not true
not true

What's that big programming book that the smart guy wrote and if anyone says he or she has worked through it the smart guy says that person is a fucking liar

nvm thread got it covered

...

Calculus by Michael Spivak

I read a chapter a day. Never recommend it because the average fedora on Veeky Forums is on the fastrack to hell and is what is known as a "reprobate".

Prove god is real.

...

bullshit

>muh mathematical argument

even thatrests on a philosophical base.

Explain the philosophical base.

just an observation here, but you sound reallllly angry about something. is it about your lost soul or your inability to understand modal logic?

>but you sound reallllly angry about something
really?
wew

probably was that "bullshit" at the start

True

Have you actually skim Baby Rudin? It's really very straightforward. The difficulty of the book comes from the exercises.

Spivak is the one everyone pretends to read.

>bullshit at the start
what? about how I never recommend it to fedoras and reprobates? My opinion hasn't changed, I do not recommend it to you.

I meant the "bullshit" I literally wrote at the stat of my post here

Maybe that's what made you thik that I was angry.

No, what made me think you were angry was when you demanded I explain my religious beliefs to you, implying that I give a shit about you or your wretched soul. I still think you're mad btw.

I read the one about bitwise tricks and it was actually very informative

could not understand a large portion of it. Couldn't do any of the excersizes.

lmao

Don't post if you can't back up your claims.

Hartshorne is almost entirely lacking in actual intuitive motivation for algebraic geometry though. Good for use with an actual class to get insight as the problem are really good. Learning on your own would be a nightmare

No, not really? That was my first year calc book at the University of Toronto.

You asked for it.

>Literally gave the most solid evidence for god's existence and you want a philosophical debate as if it matters more than the mathematics.

...

Atheists literally btfo on Veeky Forums

That thread needs a sticky though until disproven.