Prove me wrong

prove me wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=KE9m6Bu0RGI&t=1327s
youtube.com/watch?v=cAKtpCo8fPE
idt.mdh.se/~icc/principia.gif
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

0 != 1

But Thom Yorke said it's true.

Assume lesser values of 2

I;m glad you posted this. My esteemed father-in-law had a running joke with his daughters that 2+2=5, which got my wife into trouble in school once, and became a family motto of sorts. He passed away this year, and I miss him -- he was a great guy.

>Veeky Forums brought an unexpected smile to my face this day.

...

xx (2)
yy (2)

=

xxyy (4)
___

xx(2)
yy(2)

=/=

xxxyy(5)
or
xxyyy(5)

I'm a fucking math wizard

I actually read somewhere that 0! = 1

Prove xxyy != xxxyy

nigga count

this works for large values of 2

of course it is, otherwise math wouldn't work

I think our buddy Kripke can explain better than I could.

youtube.com/watch?v=KE9m6Bu0RGI&t=1327s

dirty coder

prove it's possible to prove you wrong first

2=/=7
Wow that was easy

Define "5"

...

Does this mean i can go back to my 1st grade teacher and demand a regrading of all of the questions i got wrong?

Just let S(3) = 5, now 2+2 = 5

something something a value must be equal to itself

define "define"

Would you give me a 50 for two twenties?

12345
12 34
2. 2.
One two. One two
One two. Three four.
2. 2
4
Four
This proof has no fancy concepts or discusstractions but just the numbers.

4 =/= 5

Underrated

Holy shit my sides

Redefine peano arithmetics and it's about right

5 := 2+2

1+1=10

>using the one true base
>mynigga.jpg

No, but your parents can.

Earth is a rhombus please respond

how many fingers winston?

youtube.com/watch?v=cAKtpCo8fPE

Of course and 2+3 = 4. You just replaced a symbol. kek

Use your fingers

Prove yourself right

0 is a natural number
All S(n) is a natural number
S(S(n) + S(n))
S(0) = 1
S(S(0)) = 2 and so on
All S(n) != S(S(n))
S(S(0)) + S(S(0)) = S(S(S(S(0))))

in decimal notation, that's equal to 4 and thus not 5.

you hold the burden of proof for claiming something

proof:
suppose that 2 + 2 = 5
then 1 + (2 + 2) = 5 + 1, which implies that (2 + 1) + 2 = 6, which further implies that 3 + 2 = 6.
this is a contradiction, so our assumption that 2 + 2 = 5 is wrong.
QED

2+ 2 = (1+1) + (1+1)
= 1+1+1+1
= 2+1+1
= 3+1
= 4 =/=5

Get two objects now get two other objects now count them, what number do you get?

This doesnt make any sense how can 1+1=3?

shut up nigger

idt.mdh.se/~icc/principia.gif

>then 1 + (2 + 2) = 5 + 1,
Prove it.

>which implies that
Implying 5 + 1 = 6, which you haven't proved either.

>which further implies that
Again, implying that 2 + 1 = 3, Prove it.

>this is a contradiction
Why?

Define "two"
Define "objects"
Define "count"
Define "number"
Define "get"

Is this a meme?

>Prove it.
Why?

I've got a better one, and that's already been mathematically proven
1+1=1
Now tell me how

But how is 2+2=5?

>One two. Three four.
>2 + 4 + 4 + 4
the answer is clearly 14

>how a physicist does math
>2+2=/=5
Just add hypothetical "dark" number
>2+2+"1"=5
Now you can do MATH like a physicist.

|| + || = ||||

x = y
ergo
x = x
1 = 1
5 = 5
2 + 2 + 1 = 5
Q.E.D

define a new type of addition as
[math]a \bigoplus b=a+b+1[/math]
it's commutative and associative
no problem

Define "define"

Define define

...

there is nothing wrong with feminist mathematics

in fact you just qualified as rocket scientist at ESA

praise KEK and sabotage ESA missions until they apologize for work life balance bossing of Matt Taylor