Daily reminder that ELF to upper microwave band radiation interacts with the voltage sensing sub-unit of voltage gated...

WOOOOW SUCH WISE

;^)

I dispute your use of "almost" in the first sentence.

>>Again, we can't have a dialogue unless you've read, understood, and accepted the papers
As I said, I have.

And asking someone to demonstrate a mechanistic link from a biological phenomena to human health effects is not an impossible to satisfy threshold. If such a link exists and the health effects are more than trivial, it should be easy to demonstrate.

>You're not approaching this scientifically, and you're being intellectually dishonest.
Spinning a story out of whole cloth by selectively ignoring the gaps in your account is what's intellectually dishonest.

>And asking someone to demonstrate a mechanistic link from a biological phenomena to human health effects is not an impossible to satisfy threshold.
That it hasn't already happened for you suggests that it is.

>ignoring the gaps
Elaborate. In full.

Actually, I have much less time than I thought and you take too long to respond. This is the end of our exchange.

I suggest you read the citations, and track down the Soviet and US Navy studies / bibliography that was compiled dating back to the 50's. Your mechanistic reductionism is very easily satisfied if it simply looks.

I thought you were leaving. ;) Funny how nobody who throws a fit and takes their ball home stays away from the playground for very long.

>Elaborate. In full.
You refuse to acknowledge the "some magic happens" step that must exist between the proposed alterations in gated channel-initiated signaling pathways and human health consequences.

Even the papers you've cited in this thread acknowledge that no link has been proven, merely suggested. They're full of language like "may provide" and "seems likely".

You started this thread with language that reads like you were handing down accepted facts, when at BEST you have supposition.