Not only that, but organic foods produce far less yield (estimated to be 25% less) and thus becomes less and less practical each day as more and more people are born around the planet.
Doesn't the fact that climate science is the only science where skepticism and criticism aren't welcome arouse any kind...
Gabriel Green
Noah Watson
Sounds like religion.
>people invented science
Oh right. People don't like to be wrong about ANYTHING.
Easton Cruz
>Science is not Majority Rules.
That is exactly what "empirical" means.
Owen Gomez
Skeptics are welcome as long as they *do research to back it up*, otherwise they're just throwing tantrums with no proof and trying to coerce people into believing it.
Imagine if I went on the news and said that the Earth revolved around Jupiter and offered no proof, then when astrophysicists said I was stupid I yelled that they were trying to quiet the opposition.
Benjamin Young
When you say "skepticism and criticism aren't welcome", you really mean they aren't accepted. You're free to deny whatever you want, doesn't people will think you're correct.
Matthew Allen
i feel it for you OP. these sciency guys sometimes are just fucking idiots. if they just stopped and listened for a second instead of mindlessly repeating their two lines maybe they would realize their (((data))) is being tampered with
Daniel Murphy
...
Jack Ramirez
>atheists are the butt of every joke
doesn't surprise me
Christopher Cook
Except for the fact that climate science has plenty of skepticism and criticism within the field itself, like any other scientific field does.
However, the main sources of "skepticism" of climate science are often not scientists, or are scientists / engineers that aren't even involved in the earth sciences. Keep in mind that many of these "skeptics" trace themselves back to conservative / libertarian organizations that are funded by energy interests, and are strictly anti-regulation of business, often times to the point of universal praise of the fossil fuel industry itself.
There's hardly any legitimate, true skeptics of climate change out there, the vast majority of them are uneducated conservatives who are anti-science on multiple issues, not just climate change. There's far too much exchange of dirty money among the most prominent of climate "skeptics." What really makes them non-skeptics in my mind is that when they are proven wrong, for example, with cliamtegate, or with the "pause," or with the sun's role in the current warming trend, they refuse to acknowledge it or accept the scientific evidence. Another thing that really bothers me is when they accuse scientists of fraud or manipulation, especially in regards to data that is publicly available. Climate change skepticism has no merit when it is wrapped up in conspiracies, instead of studying the evidence itself and finding flaws, or accusations of manipulation.
Elijah Morris
That sounds right.
Retarded tend to question proven fact, like most of China. No government should be without criticism. It just sounds like China is filled with repressed retardeds at that point