Who /e^x/ here?

who /e^x/ here?

>not exp(x) master race

>derivative is e^x
>second derivative is e^x
>999989498th derivative is e^x

>NTH INTEGRAL IS E^X+C

how the fuck can logfags even compete?

>>NTH INTEGRAL IS E^X+C
Wrong.

Primitive of a function is not the integral.

This.

the only reason you write exp is to be able to talk about the function that maps x to e^x without writing the x explicitly. writing exp(x) defeats the purpose

Pleb. Try writing something like
[math]e^{\frac{abcd}{efgh} int_{0}^{a} f(x) dx}[/math]

vs.

[math]\exp \left( \frac{abcd}{efgh} int_{0}^{a} f(x) dx \right[/math]

Let's try that again

[math]e^{\frac{abcd}{efgh} \int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx}[/math]

vs.

[math]\exp \left( \frac{abcd}{efgh} int_{0}^{a} f(x) dx \right)[/math]

exp(x) is so retarded that not even [math]\displaystyle \LaTeX[/math] wants to display it properly

I still fucked up the second one:

[math]\exp \left( \frac{abcd}{efgh} ]int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx \right)[/math]

>not being a plane

Use the LaTeX preview newfag

The add-on?

upper left corner of reply box.

who /e^^x/ here

not that guy but my TEX thing doesnt do anything except shrinking the reply box.

$$ \delta S = \delta \int_{t_i}^{t_f} L dt = 0 $$

[eqn] \delta S = \delta \int_{t_i}^{t_f} L dt = 0 [\eqn]

b=e^(1/e)
what function is this?

It's the analytic function that satisfies f_b(x+1) = b^f_b(x), it is to exponentiation as exponentiation is to multiplication
the picture shows different bases, for bases > e^(1/e) the function grows to infinity
for bases 1 < b < e^(1/e) it converges to values ranging from 1 to e
for bases 0 < b < 1 it oscillates like a square wave
for negative bases it's complex valued and chaotic

nth integral is [math]e^x + P_{n-1}(x)[/math] for some polynomial P you retard

fuckin bump