Are racial differences in intelligence scientifically true?

>Also IQ and other tests have proven time and again to have bias and to be inaccurate measures of intelligence. When you stack the cards in a racist manner of course they're going to have a racist outcome.
Stop it. IQ tests don't ask what a parlormaid is; there's no cultural or language barrier to IQ tests. They're not an objective measure of intelligence, but intelligence has no objective definition, either. IQ tests are reasonable measures of intelligence for certain purposes, and correlate well with other measures of intelligence for similar purposes. Just because the distribution of IQ scores for certain demographics aren't the same doesn't mean people are going to commit genocide based on this information, so stop claiming that everything is racist and trying to explain away disparity in terms of social factors.

>I've seen people on /pol/ say gas the kikes, race war now
I've seen leftists say kill all white people, what's your point exactly?
>I've seen Breitbart and infowars claim all muslims are terrorists.
No you haven't, so give me your source, because I'm confident that neither have ever claimed that *all* Muslims are terrorists. You're an idiot.
>Therefore we should be concerned for the well being of these people being treated poorly by society wouldn't you say?
But when it's whites you just want to kick them to the curb, blame them for literally fucking EVERYTHING, and tell them they're not even allowed to make their own voting decision by voting Trump, because "ermahgerd he's so sexist/racist, you can't vote for him!"? How dare they! How dare they vote for their own interests! How dare they not roll over and die and let latinos and black inherit the country! How dare they!

some one above us is literally equating down syndrome where there is an entire extra chromosome to the small allele difference between populations.

This is pointless to argue with someone who doesn't want to look up or believe in basic facts, because their arguments are mostly coming from their emotions.

>Therefore we should be concerned for the well being of these people being treated poorly by society wouldn't you say?

What an horrendously stupid idea. It is not the role of any society to care for all the people of the world, never mind those that are its avowed enemy, as are the Muslims, which happen to be enemies of all non Muslim societies, as their "holy" book makes clear.

(Pro-tip: tribalist moralities are okay)

No you haven't. You've seen reasonable and rational people say that not all muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are muslims.

If you don't consider 499/500 all, you're right. But dopey.

I guess that is why Malays in Singapore score as high as Japan in math and as high in science as the Flemish while Malaysia scores similar to Latvia

Yes but no one wants to admit it because they think the reaction will be genocide.

>"""cultural differences"""
you're not even helping these people by engaging in such denialism

...

> successful, advanced black society

Was Mali not advanced? Was Ethiopia not advanced? Were Songhai, Sokoto, and Ghana not advanced? Why should these societies even conform to your odd standards of advancement, anyways? What matters is that the created societies in which they survived and thrive.