>nih.gov
What do you know, the shills are pushing propaganda websites.
>nih.gov
What do you know, the shills are pushing propaganda websites.
>PubMed
>propaganda websites
wat.
for whom exactly do you think i'm shilling? i didn't get that from your post. Pro or anti vacc?
big pharma.
They have more paid shills than anyone.
if the truth is suppressed how could you possibly know it?
Because some people are actually fighting to get the truth out.
It's risky, but some things are worth fighting for.
So where are these truthers? These well-intentioned freedom-fighters? Where is their evidence that vaccines are a scam?
We know that vaccines prevent disease. We know that not being vaccinated increases the risk of disease. These things are documented.
You know what's not documented? A causative relationship between vaccines and mental retardation. "My son got vaccinated and then later we found out he's retarded" is not evidence of a causal link, the same way that "my son ate a ham sandwich two weeks before lightning struck him" is not evidence of a causal link.
The fact that all the anti-vaxxers I know also believe in chemtrails, nefariously fluoridated water, and government mind control programs does not lend them any credence either.
>We know that vaccines prevent disease.
Wrong.
>We know that not being vaccinated increases the risk of disease.
Wrong.
>These things are documented.
Lie.
>The fact that all the anti-vaxxers I know also believe in chemtrails, nefariously fluoridated water, and government mind control programs does not lend them any credence either.
Can't shill for just one thing, can you?
So what was it that triggered you? Was it the chemtrails or the fluoride?
Vaccines do prevent disease. Their mechanism of action is very well understood, and that's why it's possible to collect data about vaccines. Vaccines have eliminated certain diseases in the west. These diseases still exist in other parts of the world. Is that not evidence of the feasibility of vaccines? Is that not documentation? Or is it all a lie? Is every single scientist conspiring against you, some chucklefuck shitposter on an anonymous messageboard? Or maybe, just maybe, are you wrong?
I wish I was being paid to call your ilk idiots; I'd make a lot of money.
it literally is a causal link
so are these, to the uninitiated
where's the scientific paper where a doctor studied the effects of vaccination on a large sample of children? Oh wait, there isn't one. There's just a lot of blogs run by women who waited until they were 40 to conceive and now wonder why their son has a genetic defect. They blame vaccination for their troubles, and an evil conspiracy by the nebulous "BEEG FARMA" as to why there's no evidence supporting their unfounded accusation. And because the anti-vax community doesn't have a single biologist among them, they'll never be able to produce such a paper. And why's that? Is it because you're not allowed to become a biologist if you're against vaccines? Or is it because everyone who is a biologist understands how vaccines work and why they should be employed? That's the biggest fucking mystery of the century, isn't it?
If there really is a causal link, YOU could be the first person to prove it exists. Hit the books, user. Get that degree. Get some church in the boonies to collect all the shekels from that backwater shithole town in your flyover state where you were unfortunate enough to be born, and then do a real study. Maybe while you're pursuing your righteous cause you'll stop being such a fucking moron.